2014
DOI: 10.1002/pds.3700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of exposure model misspecification on signal detection in prospective pharmacovigilance

Abstract: Time to signal detection in pharmacovigilance may depend strongly on the method chosen to model the exposure. No single estimation model performed optimally across different simulated scenarios, suggesting the need for data-dependent criteria to select the model most appropriate for a given study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The critical value tables presented in this paper has already been used by the Vaccine Safety Datalink project. As new near real-time post-market safety surveillance systems are being developed, it is important to fine-tune and optimize the performance of near-real time safety surveillance systems [16,17,27,32,33,34]. While the improved time to signal is modest compared to the original version of the Poisson based MaxSPRT, there is no reason not to use these better designs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical value tables presented in this paper has already been used by the Vaccine Safety Datalink project. As new near real-time post-market safety surveillance systems are being developed, it is important to fine-tune and optimize the performance of near-real time safety surveillance systems [16,17,27,32,33,34]. While the improved time to signal is modest compared to the original version of the Poisson based MaxSPRT, there is no reason not to use these better designs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Mis-specification of the model describing the association between a time-varying exposure and the health outcome may lead to biased estimates and incorrect conclusions, and may affect both the probability and the timeliness of adverse events or therapeutic effects detection. 1,13 Because the impact of past drug use is likely to cumulate over time, 14,15 and because the relative importance of past doses likely depends on their timing, 11,[14][15][16][17][18] the weighted cumulative exposure (WCE) approach has been proposed to assess the impact of various aspects of time-varying exposure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, criteria for determining prescription durations in pharmacoepidemiology are ad hoc decision rules based on expert insights with some input from observed treatment patterns. Although the topic has received substantial interest in pharmacoepidemiological research, there is a scarcity of validated methods and little agreement on the optimal approach, despite several studies comparing them . In 2013, Pottegård and Hallas suggested to use the waiting time distribution (WTD) to determine durations in an automated manner by estimating a percentile of when a specified percentage of prevalent users had renewed their prescription.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the topic has received substantial interest in pharmacoepidemiological research, there is a scarcity of validated methods and little agreement on the optimal approach, despite several studies comparing them. [5][6][7] In 2013, Pottegård and Hallas suggested to use the waiting time distribution (WTD) to determine durations in an automated manner by estimating a percentile of when a specified percentage of prevalent users had renewed their prescription. They did, however, not consider the distinction between the component distribution observed in the WTD, the so-called forward recurrence distribution, and the inter-arrival distribution (IAD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%