1984
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2370020408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of expert testimony on trials of battered women who kill their husbands

Abstract: Increased cr#ention to family violence is reflected, in part, in the growingApproximately 1,000 husbands die at the hands of their wives each year in the United States (FBI Uniform Crime Reports, 1982). Women who kill their husbands, and particularly those who do so as the culmination of a relationship in which they have been severely abused. are beginning to attract considerable attention from the media, the legal system, and family violence researchers (see, forexample,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other researchers have shown that without evidence of BSS or BWS jurors have difficulty understanding the behavior of abused women in that they tend not to leave the intimate responsible for the mistreatment (Dodge & Greene, 1991; Greene, Raitz, & Lindblad, 1989). The findings of research in this area generally show that allowing expert witnesses to discuss the syndrome helps jurors to accept that abused woman may resort to violence instead of leaving their batterer or seeking the help of law enforcement (Blackman & Brickman, 1984: Kasian, Spanos, Terrance, & Peebles, 1993; Schuller & Hastings, 1996; Schuller, McKimmie, & Janz, 2004; Schuller et al, 1994).…”
Section: Battered Spouse Syndrome and The Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers have shown that without evidence of BSS or BWS jurors have difficulty understanding the behavior of abused women in that they tend not to leave the intimate responsible for the mistreatment (Dodge & Greene, 1991; Greene, Raitz, & Lindblad, 1989). The findings of research in this area generally show that allowing expert witnesses to discuss the syndrome helps jurors to accept that abused woman may resort to violence instead of leaving their batterer or seeking the help of law enforcement (Blackman & Brickman, 1984: Kasian, Spanos, Terrance, & Peebles, 1993; Schuller & Hastings, 1996; Schuller, McKimmie, & Janz, 2004; Schuller et al, 1994).…”
Section: Battered Spouse Syndrome and The Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She remarked that the controversies that surrounded these pursuits were diversionary and sidetracked scholars from an emphasis on discrimination. Fine (1985Fine ( , 1986 Walker, 1979Walker, , 1984 and rape (Bart & Moran, 1993;Berger, 1977;Blackman, 1981Brownmiller, 1975;Burgess & Holmstrom, 1974;Johnson, 1980;Russell, 1982;Scully & Marolla, 1993) and the women who fought back and killed their abusers (Blackman, 1986(Blackman, ,1987(Blackman, ,1990aBlackman & Brickman, 1984;Bochnak, 1981;Browne, 1987;Crocker, 1985;Ewing, 1987;Gillespie, 1989;Jones, 1980;Maguigan, 1991;Schneider, 1980Schneider, , 1986Schneider & Jordan, 1978;Walker, 1990).…”
Section: What Difference Does Difference Make?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these areas, the connection between psychology and the law has been established. Still, there are problems in this connection, and the women in the room of our texts continue to deserve our attention (Blackman, 1990a(Blackman, , 1990bBlackman & Brickman, 1984;Faigman, 1986;Schneider, 1986;Walker, 1990). I explore these problems as well.…”
Section: What Difference Does Difference Make?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the presence of expert testimony has been one variable often manipulated in cases involving battered women who kill their abusers (e.g., Kasian, Spanos, Terrance, & Peebles, 1993;Schuller & Hastings, 1996;Schuller, McKimmie, & Janz, 2004;Schuller, Smith, & Olson, 1994). Many view the presentation of expert testimony as an opportunity to reeducate the jurors about the plight of the battered woman (Blackman & Brickman, 1984). Such testimony, however, is not always effective in influencing juror judgments (cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%