2019
DOI: 10.1108/srj-07-2017-0138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of existence of royal family directors on corporate social responsibility reporting: a servant leadership perspective

Abstract: Purpose Drawing on servant leadership theory, this study aims to investigate whether the presence of royal family members on boards of directors impacts corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting. Design/methodology/approach CSR scores from a Bloomberg database are used and royal family data are collected from annual reports. The required analyses to test the hypotheses of this study have been performed. Findings The findings demonstrate a positive relationship between the presence of royal family dir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
7
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After considering eight widely used board characteristics in corporate governance, we find evidence (1) that the coefficient board size supports the ineffectiveness of large boards, consistent with Eisenberg et al [1] and Yermack [3]; (2) that independent directors have no significant effect on firm value, consistent with Bhagat and Black [11]; (3) that outside CEO directors show a positive impact on firm value, supporting the advising and enhancing role of outside CEO directors [8]; (4) that there is no significant impact of directors with financial expertise on firm value; (5) that presence of a director with a CEO as a family member has a significant negative effect on firm value, consistent with prior studies [7,24]; (6) that on average, the more diversified the board is in terms of director age, nationality, and gender, firm value measured by Tobin's Q is likely to decrease significantly. These results are different from the expectations of effectiveness of directors with financial experience [14,15], foreign directors [17,18], and female directors [19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After considering eight widely used board characteristics in corporate governance, we find evidence (1) that the coefficient board size supports the ineffectiveness of large boards, consistent with Eisenberg et al [1] and Yermack [3]; (2) that independent directors have no significant effect on firm value, consistent with Bhagat and Black [11]; (3) that outside CEO directors show a positive impact on firm value, supporting the advising and enhancing role of outside CEO directors [8]; (4) that there is no significant impact of directors with financial expertise on firm value; (5) that presence of a director with a CEO as a family member has a significant negative effect on firm value, consistent with prior studies [7,24]; (6) that on average, the more diversified the board is in terms of director age, nationality, and gender, firm value measured by Tobin's Q is likely to decrease significantly. These results are different from the expectations of effectiveness of directors with financial experience [14,15], foreign directors [17,18], and female directors [19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…It is likely that companies with family directors in their boards are less likely to include incentive-based plans, and are also less likely to have higher levels of compensation [7]. In addition, the presence of family directors is positively associated with corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting [24].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, many studies have indicated growing interest in CSR disclosure (e.g. Alazzani et al, 2019;Garcia et al, 2020). Researchers argue that it performs a vital function in enhancing the quality of communication among stakeholders (De Klerk et al, 2015).…”
Section: Csr Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the influence of AC features on CSRDL in the Jordanian market, we estimate the following ordinary least squares (OLS) regression model with robust standard errors (Alazzani et al, 2019;Appuhami & Tashakor, 2017). We winsorise all variables that have extreme values to overcome the effect of the outlier (Harper & Sun, 2019): CSRDL = CSR disclosure level; β 0 = Intercept; β 1-11 = Variables coefficients; Year is the period of study; and є = Error term (see Table 2 for variables definitions).…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation