“…For instance, in contrast to ethical idealists, ethical relativists tend to see little wrong with ethically questionable actions performed by consumers (Al-Khatib et al, 2004;Erffmeyer et al, 1999), accountants (Elias, 2002), or marketers (Kleiser et al, 2003), regard some manifestations of academic dishonesty as relatively appropriate (Rawwas et al, 2006), are less likely to recognize the presence of ethical issues (Sparks and Hunt, 1998), and are inclined to be Machiavellian, opportunistic, and calculating (Al-Khatib et al, 2004;Al-Khatib et al, 2005). High idealists, in contrast, tend to reject most forms of academic, business, and consumer dishonesty (Dubinsky et al, 2004;Rawwas et al, 2006, Steenhaut andVan Kenhove, 2006;Vitell and Paolillo, 2003), believe that ethics is important in business contexts (Etheredge, 1999;Singhapakdi et al, 1996;Vitell and Hidalgo, 2006), tend not to be Machiavellian (Al-Khatib et al, 2004;Ho et al, 1997), and feel that ethical infractions should be punished severely (Barnett et al, 1996;Chiu and Erdener, 2003;Giacalone et al, 1995). Since highly religious people are more likely to be ethical idealists, this may suggest that such individuals will be less inclined to cheat.…”