The Impact of Economic Coercion on Public Opinion: The Case of US–China Currency Relations

Abstract

In recent years, the United States has increasingly tried to change other governments’ economic policies by threatening to punish those countries if they do not change course. To better understand the political consequences of these tactics, this paper examines how external threats influence public support for policy change in targeted states. We consider three mechanisms through which economic coercion might alter public opinion: by changing individuals’ interests, by activating their national identities, and by providing them with new information about a policy’s distributive effects. To test these rival explanations, we focus on the case of China–US currency relations. Using data from a survey experiment of Chinese internet users, we find strong support for the informational updating theory. Our evidence suggests that economic coercion can reduce support for policy change because it leads individuals to update their beliefs about who wins and loses from economic policy changes.

Public responses to foreign protectionism: Evidence from the US-China trade war

“…One challenge with using online samples is the inattentiveness of respondents (Harden et al, 2019 ). To alleviate this concern, we follow Gueorguiev et al ( 2020 ) and drop all subjects that completed the survey in less than five minutes. 8 Respondents that completed the survey at that speed were likely paying limited attention to the questions.…”

The Political Economy of Chinese Debt and International Monetary Fund Conditionality

“…Second, our work relates to recent political economy scholarship examining the importance of Chinese loans for recipient governments' relations with international financial institutions and its international political maneuvering 4 Our work also expands on the recent findings of McDowell and Steinberg (2017) and Gueorguiev, McDowell, and Steinberg (2020) that analyze the role of the internationalization of the Renminbi and the rise of China as an international financier of the developing world. ( Corkin 2016 ;Hernandez 2017 ;Zeitz 2021 ;Cormier and Manger 2022 ;Watkins 2022 ).…”

Towards a Long-Term Sino-US Relationship: Implications and Potential Solutions of the Future Chinese Media Strategy for Global Speech Power

“…Vaccinations, the United States, Joe Biden, and Beijing are the most frequent terms in public opinion messaging pertaining to China, while the most frequent terms in public opinion messages referring to the United States are China, corporations, vaccines, and Bitcoin. Additionally, there was a strong ideological rivalry on particular subjects (AlKhatib et al, 2020;Gueorguiev et al, 2020;Zhou & Moy, 2007). Human rights and quarantine were the most often used keywords in searches on the themes of Tibet, Xinjiang, and Hong Kong.…”