2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2022.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of dynamic tongue reconstruction using functional muscle transfer: A retrospective review of 94 cases with functional outcome analysis for various glossectomy defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, reconstruction with these non-innervated flaps makes the neo-tongue a rather static structure, resulting in volume loss and mobility limitations. To overcome this concern, dynamic reconstruction with motor-reinervated free flaps was introduced, maintaining muscle tone, volume, and mobility of the neo-tongue [ 5 ]. Thus, the innervated musculocutaneous submental artery island flap is a suitable alternative to microsurgical free tissue transfer for the functional reconstruction of tongue defects following cancer resection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, reconstruction with these non-innervated flaps makes the neo-tongue a rather static structure, resulting in volume loss and mobility limitations. To overcome this concern, dynamic reconstruction with motor-reinervated free flaps was introduced, maintaining muscle tone, volume, and mobility of the neo-tongue [ 5 ]. Thus, the innervated musculocutaneous submental artery island flap is a suitable alternative to microsurgical free tissue transfer for the functional reconstruction of tongue defects following cancer resection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In tongue cancer reconstruction alone there have been many reports that include terms such as hemiglossectomy, partial glossectomy and total glossectomy. However, within these studies, it is not always clear if the floor of the mouth or other adjacent structures, such as extrinsic tongue muscles, suprahyoid muscles, mandible, maxilla, or retromolar trigone, were involved in the ablation (Box [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] ). 3,10 Without a clear description of what is removed, it is impossible for the reconstructive surgeon to fully evaluate the results presented in the study (Box).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%