2022
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of Drew Noden's work on our understanding of craniofacial musculoskeletal integration

Abstract: The classical anatomist Drew Noden spearheaded craniofacial research, laying the foundation for our modern molecular understanding of development, evolution, and disorders of the craniofacial skeleton. His work revealed the origin of cephalic musculature and the role of cranial neural crest (CNC) in early formation and patterning of the head musculoskeletal structures. Much of modern cranial tendon research advances a foundation of knowledge that Noden built using classical quail-chick transplantation experime… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differentiating between these possibilities will likely require a deeper understanding of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) regulating tendon progenitor specification, as Scx remains the earliest reported tendon marker 24,25 . Tendons in the craniofacial region like the MST are derived from cranial neural crest cells (CNCCs), while those in limbs are derived from the lateral plate mesoderm 2628 . Regional differences in the GRNs underlying tendon development and regeneration are therefore likely to exist and have yet to be fully explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differentiating between these possibilities will likely require a deeper understanding of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) regulating tendon progenitor specification, as Scx remains the earliest reported tendon marker 24,25 . Tendons in the craniofacial region like the MST are derived from cranial neural crest cells (CNCCs), while those in limbs are derived from the lateral plate mesoderm 2628 . Regional differences in the GRNs underlying tendon development and regeneration are therefore likely to exist and have yet to be fully explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differentiating between these possibilities will likely require a deeper understanding of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) regulating tendon progenitor specification, as Scx remains the earliest reported tendon marker 26,27 . Tendons in the craniofacial region like the MST are derived from cranial neural crest cells (CNCCs), while those in limbs are derived from the lateral plate mesoderm 25,28,29 . Regional differences in the GRNs underlying tendon development and regeneration are therefore likely to exist and have yet to be fully explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%