2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-538x(03)00021-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of debt on market reactions to the revaluation of noncurrent assets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The market reaction to these revaluations depends on whether the market views a revaluation as decreasing information asymmetry (at low levels of debt) or as opportunistic (high levels of debt) (Courtenay and Cahan, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The market reaction to these revaluations depends on whether the market views a revaluation as decreasing information asymmetry (at low levels of debt) or as opportunistic (high levels of debt) (Courtenay and Cahan, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aboody et al (1999) indicate that revaluations of fixed assets among UK firms are positively related to share prices. Courtenay and Cahan (2004) extended Aboody et al (1999) study and indicate that revaluations of fixed assets are more value relevant for firms with low leverage than for firms with high leverage. The most relevant study to the current setting is by Hassan and Mohd-Saleh (2010).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Development Value Relevancementioning
confidence: 60%
“…Their findings indicate that fair values of different classes of assets are significantly associated with the share prices as they have implications for firms' future profitability (Barth & Clinch, 1998). Their results are supported by Aboody et al (1999), Courtenay and Cahan (2004) and Hassan and Mohd-Saleh (2010). Aboody et al (1999) indicate that revaluations of fixed assets among UK firms are positively related to share prices.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Development Value Relevancementioning
confidence: 70%
“…Though there is no conclusive evidence grossly disproving the cost model over the revaluation model, Gaeremynck and Veugelers (1999) hold that revaluation often provides a reliable indication for potential investors. Thus, prior studies have found that revaluation of fixed asset has significant impact on firms’ valuation (Aboody, Barth, & Kasznik, 1999; Barth & Clinch, 1998; Courtney & Cahan, 2004; Easton, Eddey, & Trevor, 1993; Emanuel, 1989; Ghicas, Hevas, & Papadaki, 1996; Jaggi & Tsui, 2001; Standish & Ung, 1982). Iatridis and Kilirgiotis (2012) show that asset revaluation causes favourable effect on firms’ financial plans and position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%