Abstract:Emotional labor research largely focuses on client-facing occupations. However, employees across occupations engage in emotional labor when they perceive that specific types of emotional communication are required to align with organizational expectations. The current two-week daily survey study of 42 employees was conducted at a small website development company to examine relationships between employees’ emotional labor, physical health, and psychological well-being. Results indicated that daily emotional la… Show more
“…Much of this research has focused on work itself, particular professions, well-being, and sustainability, and representing Miller et al's workplace emotion types in overlapping ways. Riforgiate et al [33] defined emotional labor as the "management of emotions as part of one's job performance" (p. 392) and explored its links to daily communication, physical health, and psychological well-being through a two-week-long diary study. They found that different forms of emotional labor might prove detrimental to workers' well-being.…”
Section: Emotions and Affective Gendered Organizingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…you take a fair amount of unpleasant things and just deal with it." These comments constitute the marginalizing communication often found in STEM cultures [33].…”
The questions of why there are so few women in engineering and how to change engineering cultures to be more inclusive have garnered much social scientific research and considerable funding. Despite numerous findings and interventions, no studies to our knowledge have analyzed how difference is constituted discursively, materially, and affectively in ways that are deeply embedded in engineering occupational and societal cultures. This study takes an affective gendered organizing approach to analyze how affect is constituted through emotions/talk, interactions, and materialities. Using constructivist grounded theory, we explored our interview data of 69 engineers (45 women and 24 men) to find three themes. The first describes women’s sensate experiences that underlie their expressions of (un)belongingness and (in)visibility. The second depicts men’s emotional labor to voice inclusion while enacting exclusion. The third pulls these feelings forward as the impetus for women’s constitution of feminist third spaces/places that operate as sites of collective emotional labor and resilience. Throughout we display the contradictory and essential embodiment of affect within individuals’ identities and as a sensemaking force that continues to constitute organizing systems of inequity. Taking an affective gendered organizing approach enables researchers and practitioners to respond more fully to the question of why inclusion is so difficult to achieve and to develop sustainable interventions for women’s career success in STEM.
“…Much of this research has focused on work itself, particular professions, well-being, and sustainability, and representing Miller et al's workplace emotion types in overlapping ways. Riforgiate et al [33] defined emotional labor as the "management of emotions as part of one's job performance" (p. 392) and explored its links to daily communication, physical health, and psychological well-being through a two-week-long diary study. They found that different forms of emotional labor might prove detrimental to workers' well-being.…”
Section: Emotions and Affective Gendered Organizingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…you take a fair amount of unpleasant things and just deal with it." These comments constitute the marginalizing communication often found in STEM cultures [33].…”
The questions of why there are so few women in engineering and how to change engineering cultures to be more inclusive have garnered much social scientific research and considerable funding. Despite numerous findings and interventions, no studies to our knowledge have analyzed how difference is constituted discursively, materially, and affectively in ways that are deeply embedded in engineering occupational and societal cultures. This study takes an affective gendered organizing approach to analyze how affect is constituted through emotions/talk, interactions, and materialities. Using constructivist grounded theory, we explored our interview data of 69 engineers (45 women and 24 men) to find three themes. The first describes women’s sensate experiences that underlie their expressions of (un)belongingness and (in)visibility. The second depicts men’s emotional labor to voice inclusion while enacting exclusion. The third pulls these feelings forward as the impetus for women’s constitution of feminist third spaces/places that operate as sites of collective emotional labor and resilience. Throughout we display the contradictory and essential embodiment of affect within individuals’ identities and as a sensemaking force that continues to constitute organizing systems of inequity. Taking an affective gendered organizing approach enables researchers and practitioners to respond more fully to the question of why inclusion is so difficult to achieve and to develop sustainable interventions for women’s career success in STEM.
“…Interactive management research offers organizational communication scholars a tool to research diverse topics within the discipline of communication studies. For example, IMR would be particularly useful in domains such as the following: identifying ways to promote employee well-being (Riforgiate, et al, 2021); creating diverse, inclusive, and equitable workplaces (Ballard et al, 2020); facilitating organizational sensemaking in response to a crisis (Sahay & Dwyer, 2021); or promoting Corporate Social Responsibility through strategic planning based on stakeholders’ input (Maktoufi et al, 2020). Infusing these domains with IMR methods offers a methodological approach that promotes organizing through participants’ collective intelligence and communication.…”
In this research methods essay, we describe Interactive Management Research (IMR), a participatory action research methodology with extensive applications in organizational settings but new to organizational communication research. IMR offers possibilities as a participant-centered methodology that is particularly well suited for complex organizational design situations requiring a systems perspective. We detail two versions of IMR, an interview-based method (IMRi) and a group-based method (IMRg), using a case study of each method to illustrate their application to organizational communication research. We believe IMR is an approach to participatory action research that can provide unique insights into the systems thinking and communication that shapes organizations and organizing.
“…Employees are not the only ones that may suffer unintended adverse outcomes associated with PIPs embedded within disciplinary structures due to the emotional nature of the exchange (Miller-Merrell, 2021). Managers who supervise the PIP process may also suffer poor work outcomes such as stress related burnout and emotional dissonance if they experience a conflict of emotion (Humphrey, 2012;Pugh et al, 2011;Riforgiate et al, 2022). As an occupational requirement, emotional labor requires the employee (in this example, the manager) to look and act in specific ways to meet the demands of the job (Grandey et al, 2015;Grandey, & Sayre, 2019;Humphrey et al, 2008).…”
Management of human capital through the use of performance management systems and performance improvement plans is of the utmost importance to managers. Employees are the most valuable assets companies possess. Effective management of human capital can have a direct impact on individual and team performance, as well as the success of the business. This paper focuses on the use of the performance improvement plan and its impact on employee performance outside of the progressive disciplinary process. In this paper, we review the existing literature on human capital and performance improvement plans, and make managerial recommendations for the use of performance improvement plans going forward.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.