2013
DOI: 10.1108/mip-04-2013-0065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of customer‐company identification on consumer reactions to new corporate initiatives

Abstract: Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:198285 [] For AuthorsIf you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the house of brands approach, a company does not give prominence to its corporate brand, but rather promotes several product brands that are presented as separate. This strategy is particularly effective when the company is highly diversified and operates in potentially conflicting markets and distribution channels (Aaker and Joachimsthaler, 2000a; Ashraf and Merunka, 2013). For instance, Procter & Gamble (P&G) is the owner of brands as diverse and disconnected as the hair care products Wella and Pantene, the laundry detergents Ariel and Fairy, AZ toothpaste and Pampers nappies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the house of brands approach, a company does not give prominence to its corporate brand, but rather promotes several product brands that are presented as separate. This strategy is particularly effective when the company is highly diversified and operates in potentially conflicting markets and distribution channels (Aaker and Joachimsthaler, 2000a; Ashraf and Merunka, 2013). For instance, Procter & Gamble (P&G) is the owner of brands as diverse and disconnected as the hair care products Wella and Pantene, the laundry detergents Ariel and Fairy, AZ toothpaste and Pampers nappies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is not possible to assess the idea of ethical perception without referencing specific corporations and their respective brands when requesting consumer feedback. Hence, two specific companies with two brands each were referenced on the evaluation questionnaires used in this study (Ashraf and Merunka, 2013). To analyze our proposed model and meet the research objectives and to reduce non-systematic bias and have more options for consumers to respond, we include the product brands of iPhone and MacBook under the corporate umbrella of Apple, and Braun and Oral-B under that of P&G, among others.…”
Section: Research Methodology and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the brand portfolio is a basket of apparently stand-alone brands (Laforet, 2015). This kind of strategy is particularly advisable for highly diversified companies operating in potentially conflicting markets and distributing products through varied and inconsistent sales channels (Aaker and Joachimsthaler, 2000; Ashraf and Merunka, 2013). Moreover, the house-of-brands strategy is useful when entering new product categories and growing through stretching up/down strategies in highly segmented markets, establishing precise positioning for each product (Laforet, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%