2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01647.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Crossgroup Friendships in South Africa: Affective Mediators and Multigroup Comparisons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
64
1
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
5
64
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Perspective taking denotes the ability to see the world from the eyes of another, and metaphorically to put yourself in the shoes of another. It has been shown, for example, that perspective taking can improve attitudes towards others such as racial or ethnic outgroups (Swart et al, 2010). However, virtual embodiment provides a technological method for actually realising perspective taking -when embodied in a virtual body it is literally the case that you see through the eyes of a (virtual) other, so it is not especially surprising that virtual embodiment can lead to a change in empathy, since it well realises perspective taking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perspective taking denotes the ability to see the world from the eyes of another, and metaphorically to put yourself in the shoes of another. It has been shown, for example, that perspective taking can improve attitudes towards others such as racial or ethnic outgroups (Swart et al, 2010). However, virtual embodiment provides a technological method for actually realising perspective taking -when embodied in a virtual body it is literally the case that you see through the eyes of a (virtual) other, so it is not especially surprising that virtual embodiment can lead to a change in empathy, since it well realises perspective taking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reducing complexity plays a role in dehumanizing the Other in processes that precede violence (Cameron, 2011b;Halpern & Weinstein, 2004). Conversely, it has long been known that inter-group contact can lead to reduction in prejudice (Allport, 1979), and more recently that contact contributes to allowing the Other multiple identities (Brown & Hewstone, 2005) and to increased perception of outgroup variability (Swart, Hewstone, Christ, & Voci, 2010). Increasing the complexity of the Other is a kind of 'particularization', contrasted by Billig with categorization (Billig, 1985(Billig, , 1996.…”
Section: Terrorism Increased Uncertainty and Social Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accordance with the extended contact hypothesis, even having a friend maintaining inter-group relationships improves someone's attitudes towards that given group (Brown and Hewstone, 2005;Pettigrew et al, 2007;Stark, 2011;Swart et al, 2010;Turner et al, 2007). In this case, friends serve as positive exemplars of their groups, which helps the inclusion of their group memberships in the own psychological self (Wright et al, 1997).…”
Section: The Effect Of Direct and Indirect Contactmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…There is a growing consensus that true racial integration requires more than merely putting people of different categories into proximity (Moody, 2001;Pettigrew and Tropp, 2008;Stark, 2011;Swart et al, 2010;Turner et al, 2007): true integration occurs not just when people are in similar settings, but when they interact as equals. For adolescents, this involves forming and maintaining social relations and social scientists, school administrators and the general public are interested in understanding the features that shape friendship formation across race, since research shows repeatedly that substantive social contact reduces prejudice, increases social cohesion and fosters positive social acceptance of difference and diversity (Allport, 1954;Pettigrew and Tropp, 2008;Tropp and Pettigrew, 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation