2022
DOI: 10.1017/ice.2022.10
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on healthcare-associated infections in 2020: A summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network – ADDENDUM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 Clostridium difficile and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections were also reported to have increased in 2020. 10 These increased HAI rates are likely due in part to exhausted workers or lack of sufficient staff, increased acuity of patients who postponed healthcare services early in the pandemic, longer lengths of stay and medical device use, and crisis PPE protocols 10 , 11 , but a shift in focus from routine IPC to pandemic response may have also contributed. Returning to teaching and enforcement of routine IPC practices should aid in reversing these HAI trends.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Clostridium difficile and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections were also reported to have increased in 2020. 10 These increased HAI rates are likely due in part to exhausted workers or lack of sufficient staff, increased acuity of patients who postponed healthcare services early in the pandemic, longer lengths of stay and medical device use, and crisis PPE protocols 10 , 11 , but a shift in focus from routine IPC to pandemic response may have also contributed. Returning to teaching and enforcement of routine IPC practices should aid in reversing these HAI trends.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is a review of different retrospective studies, and thus, generalization of the impact of prevention bundles is difficult due to missing data since, generally, most papers were not studying prevention bundles and a few studies correlated bundle implementation with VAP rates. Another limitation of the current review is that all of the included studies were conducted before the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and, therefore, do not take into consideration the likely increases in VAP rates [ 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 56 Based on a 2020 review of the current evidence, the CDC continues to recommend the use of contact precautions for MRSA colonized or infected patients 67 During the COVID-19 pandemic, hospital-onset MRSA bloodstream infections increased nationally; however, whether declining use of contact precautions for MRSA-colonized or MRSA-infected patients played a significant role in this increase remains unknown. 68 Studies have suggested that patients may be persistent MRSA carriers for prolonged periods (median duration in one study, 8.5 months). 69 , 70 Use of contact precautions for patients with a history of MRSA is recommended.…”
Section: Section 4: Recommended Strategies To Prevent Mrsamentioning
confidence: 96%