2016
DOI: 10.1002/j.1681-4835.2016.tb00529.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Contextual Factors on the Implementation of Government E‐Strategy in Previously Disadvantaged Areas in Cape Town

Abstract: Despite the fact that it has been established that contextual factors affect implementation of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) projects, there is a dearth of information on how these were addressed in the implementation of the whitepaper on e-education in schools in previously disadvantaged areas in South Africa. This interpretive study, guided by contextual interaction theory, examines the impact of contextual factors in the implementation of ICT in schools in previously disadvantaged areas. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Digital competence in the classroom is dependent on the training received by teachers (Gómez, 2015 ). Consequently, educators must take into account not only the context (Mooketsi & Chigona, 2016 ), but also the technological, pedagogical and content knowledge they need to teach (Koehler et al, 2014 ; Mishra & Koehler, 2006 ). They must also encourage teachers to acquire the necessary knowledge, skills and attitudes they must have in order to fulfil their role (Agyei & Voogt, 2011 ; Knezek et al, 2000 ; Korthagen, 2017 ; Mishra & Warr, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Digital competence in the classroom is dependent on the training received by teachers (Gómez, 2015 ). Consequently, educators must take into account not only the context (Mooketsi & Chigona, 2016 ), but also the technological, pedagogical and content knowledge they need to teach (Koehler et al, 2014 ; Mishra & Koehler, 2006 ). They must also encourage teachers to acquire the necessary knowledge, skills and attitudes they must have in order to fulfil their role (Agyei & Voogt, 2011 ; Knezek et al, 2000 ; Korthagen, 2017 ; Mishra & Warr, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study seeks to identify the digital competence needs of Melilla’s teacher trainees in order to improve the city’s educational situation. The city of Melilla has one of the most complex educational contexts in Europe (PISA, 2015), which is a determining factor in the implementation of ICT projects (Mooketsi & Chigona, 2016 ). Despite the benefits that ICTs bring to society (Fang et al, 2019 ), people from disadvantaged contexts are excluded from accessing or using them (Tamatea & Pramitasari, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted for South Africa by Ford & Botha (2010) "despite the noble intentions and efforts driving implementation of information communication technologies in education, the integration of ICTs into teaching and learning has been wrought with challenges Some of the challenges relate to the digital divide, adoption barriers and self-efficacy, inadequate ICT resources, limited access to the internet, social status of potential users of ICT, technophobia and fear of ICT adoption as a result of advanced age (Mooketsi & Chigona, 2016). These problems are varied across differing contexts in which ICT is required thus leading to an implementation process "besieged with dispersed and uncoordinated implementation programs and projects' (Botha & Ford, 2010, p. 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do so, this study we used Bressers’s (2007, 2009) CIT as a theoretical framework. As CIT was developed and used extensively by environmental policy scholars, its application across K–12 education policy implementation is sparse (e.g., Lybarger, 2017; Mooketsi & Chigona, 2016; Salaj, 2017), and it is even more limited in higher education (e.g., Alkanat, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%