2019
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of connectedness on social functioning in youth with brain tumors

Abstract: Purpose Children with brain tumors (BT) are at risk for difficulties with social functioning. Research to date has focused on deficits, with no studies identifying areas of strength or resilience. Our objective was to assess the potential influence of connectedness on social functioning in youth with BT as compared with children with other cancers. Methods Children with cancer (20 with BT, 33 with other diagnoses) were enrolled on a longitudinal study of psychosocial functioning. The current study included mea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, ive longitudinal cohort studies were included that gathered and reported on data from adolescents within the 10-21-yearold range at one or more time points, but also included time points that reported on age ranges outside of the inclusion criteria. This included: initial recruitment in 9-17 age range with subsequent longitudinal follow up in 10-19 range (Willard et al, 2019), initial recruitment in 8-17 age range followed longitudinally for 3 or 4 years (Ehman et al, 2019;Okado et al, 2018), and initial recruitment of 12-17 year-olds followed for 5 years or into young adulthood (Krull et al, 2010;Weinstein et al, 2018).…”
Section: Inclusion/exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, ive longitudinal cohort studies were included that gathered and reported on data from adolescents within the 10-21-yearold range at one or more time points, but also included time points that reported on age ranges outside of the inclusion criteria. This included: initial recruitment in 9-17 age range with subsequent longitudinal follow up in 10-19 range (Willard et al, 2019), initial recruitment in 8-17 age range followed longitudinally for 3 or 4 years (Ehman et al, 2019;Okado et al, 2018), and initial recruitment of 12-17 year-olds followed for 5 years or into young adulthood (Krull et al, 2010;Weinstein et al, 2018).…”
Section: Inclusion/exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings highlight that when isolated in hospital for significant periods of time, the children and adolescents were focused on feeling connected with the caring adults around them. This finding is supported by research in child development, which highlights that children seek connection as a means of protection, which creates a sense of attachment (Barber & Schluterman, 2008;Willard, Russell, Long, & Phipps, 2019). Research with nurses working on a bone marrow transplant unit that requires patient isolation documented similar findings, with nurses reporting feelings of closeness and friendship with many children and families with whom they work, citing a unique shared experience during a very isolating and intense treatment journey (Morrison & Morris, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Example items include: “Makes friends easily;” “Is well‐liked by other people;” and “Is comfortable being in large groups.” Questions are answered using a 4‐point Likert scale from “never” to “always.” Raw scores are converted to age‐standardized T‐scores with higher scores indicative of better functioning. Reliability and validity has been established 23 and the measure has been previously used with survivors of childhood cancer 24 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliability and validity has been established 23 and the measure has been previously used with survivors of childhood cancer. 24…”
Section: Social Emotional Assets and Resilience Scalementioning
confidence: 99%