2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06892-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of component separation technique versus no component separation technique on complications and quality of life in the repair of large ventral hernias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
19
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that AWR-CS was utilized in 6.8% of these cases and was associated with increased overall complications that result in increased healthcare utilization in terms of LOS and costs. These complications were due to surgical wound-related complications for the most part, which is in line with prior data [18] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that AWR-CS was utilized in 6.8% of these cases and was associated with increased overall complications that result in increased healthcare utilization in terms of LOS and costs. These complications were due to surgical wound-related complications for the most part, which is in line with prior data [18] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In these patients, successful IHR can be difficult due to a history of open abdomen and reoperations that often cause distorted abdominal wall anatomy (i.e., limited tissue elasticity, migration of the rectus abdominis muscle and decreased compliance of the oblique musculature). Given the complexity of IH after a trauma laparotomy, AWR with component separation may be required in some cases to achieve a durable abdominal closure while improving health-related quality of life [18] . This technique is often used in complex situations [19] and requires a multidisciplinary approach that includes anesthesiologists, general surgeons and plastic surgeons [20] to allow additional fascial approximation that would not be possible otherwise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To add more to the problem, evidence exists that increasing BMI is correlated with decreased density of major deep inferior epigastric perforators (35). More interestingly, repair of large incisional hernias with achievement of primary fascial closure without components separation appears to yield similar hernia recurrence rates but significantly lower wound infection rates compared to primary fascial closure with use of components separation (36). In this cohort of patients, similarly low rates of bridging 1.8% in the no-component separation group and 2.7% in the components separation group were reported, suggesting that it is the achievement of midline recreation in a tension-free manner that is the key driver for hernia recurrence prevention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patients can be found in a wide range from those who underwent a simple umbilical hernia to wide ventral hernias with multiple incisional operations. In addition, there may be quite different surgical techniques such as how the mesh is placed (onlay, inlay, sublay), mesh type and whether or not compartment separation is performed 15,18 . Also, the pannus tissue volume of the panniculectomy shows significant differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%