1989
DOI: 10.1080/03014223.1989.10422897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of common and German wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) on the New Zealand beekeeping industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that there were no overwintering nests there. Furthennore, New Zealand beekeepers destroy no more overwintering nests in areas where common wasps are present compared to where there are only Gennan wasps (Clapperton et al 1989). Only two overwintering common wasp colonies had been recorded before the present study, both in California, USA (Duncan 1939;Gambino 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that there were no overwintering nests there. Furthennore, New Zealand beekeepers destroy no more overwintering nests in areas where common wasps are present compared to where there are only Gennan wasps (Clapperton et al 1989). Only two overwintering common wasp colonies had been recorded before the present study, both in California, USA (Duncan 1939;Gambino 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, German wasps are less efficient than common wasps at collecting natural honeydew (Harris et al 1994), and therefore may be forced to scavenge more. Perhaps this is why beehives are robbed more frequently by German wasps than by common wasps (Clapperton et al 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…has been present in New Zealand since 1945 (Thomas 1960), and the common wasp V. vulgaris (L.) probably first established around the Wellington area in the late 1970s (Donovan 1984). The mild climate, the abundance of food, and the absence of natural enemies have contributed to the establishment of large populations of both species, to the extent that they are now considered to be major pests in both unmodified (e.g., Beggs & Wilson 1991;Harris 1991) and modified environments (e.g., Clapperton et al 1989;Dymock et al 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%