The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Colleague Peer Review on the Radiotherapy Treatment Planning Process in the Radical Treatment of Lung Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients received 55Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks planned with the intensity modulated radiotherapy technique and delivered as 6MV arc therapy, with daily online cone beam-CT image guidance, treating Monday to Friday for 4 weeks. All target volumes were subject to peer review [28]. Patients were routinely clinically assessed once per week by an Oncologist or Radiographer.…”
Section: Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients received 55Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks planned with the intensity modulated radiotherapy technique and delivered as 6MV arc therapy, with daily online cone beam-CT image guidance, treating Monday to Friday for 4 weeks. All target volumes were subject to peer review [28]. Patients were routinely clinically assessed once per week by an Oncologist or Radiographer.…”
Section: Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She completed 55 Gy in 20 fractions planned with the intensity modulated radiotherapy technique and delivered as 6 MV arc therapy, with daily online cone beam-CT image guidance, treating Monday to Friday for 4 weeks [16]. Target volumes were subject to peer review [17]. Tumour shrinkage was noted during routine offline imaging review.…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tremendous progress in cancer treatment has been achieved over the recent decades due to our growing understanding on the biology of cancer and the development of new technologies such as the medical imaging, nanotechnology and health information technology [ 1 , 2 ]. However, overall, for the majority types of cancer, especially the advanced and recurrent-metastatic cancers, the effectiveness of treatment is still limited [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]. The currently available conventional treatment options for cancer include surgery, cytotoxic chemotherapy, radiation therapy, targeted biological therapy, immunotherapy or combinations of all these.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%