The impact of coffee certification on small‐scale producers’ livelihoods: a case study from the Jimma Zone, Ethiopia

Abstract

What is the impact of product certification on small-scale farmers' livelihoods? To what extent does the participation of Ethiopian small-scale coffee farmers in certified local cooperative structures improve their socioeconomic situation? To answer these questions, this article employs household data of 249 coffee farmers from six different cooperatives collected in the Jimma zone of Southwestern Ethiopia in 2009. Findings show that the certification of coffee cooperatives has in total a low impact on small-scale coffee producers' livelihoods mainly due to (1) low productivity, (2) insignificant price premium, and (3) poor access to credit and information from the cooperative. Differences in production and organizational capacities between the local cooperatives are mirrored in the extent of the certification benefits for the smallholders. "Good" cooperatives have reaped the benefits of certification, whereas "bad" ones did not fare well. In this regard the "cooperative effect" overlies the "certification effect." JEL classification: Q13, Q18, R11, R12

Effects of certification schemes for agricultural production on socio-economic outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review

“…There is very substantial heterogeneity (I 2 =97.5%). In part this is due to the presence of a clear outlier, Jena et al (2012), whose point estimate (SMD -2.2, 95% CI from -2.53 to -1.87) lies far to the left all other estimates. The other statistically significant results are , who find only a modestly negative result, and Bennett at al (2012).…”

“…Due to resource constraints however, this was not possible where studies reported on large numbers of variables (e.g Jena et al, 2012). In this limited number of cases we chose to focus on variables for which we had at least one other study (to allow for meta-analysis) and choose variables that were measured in similar ways to other studies, so as to minimise heterogeneity due to measurement issues, or came closer conceptually to the underlying construct (for instance we always chose to extract information on net rather than gross incomes, where both where available).…”

Economic Analisys of a Coffee-Banana System of a Family-Based Agriculture at the Atlantic Forest Zone, Brazil

“…Coffee family farmers worldwide struggle with the coffee prices volatility in conventional market (Bacon, 2004;Jena et al, 2012). Alternative models such as organic, fairtrade, specialty or certified coffee intend to reduce this vulnerability, but are reports of contradictory results on family farmers' economy (Bacon 2004;Jena et al, 2012;Kilian et al, 2006).…”

“…Alternative models such as organic, fairtrade, specialty or certified coffee intend to reduce this vulnerability, but are reports of contradictory results on family farmers' economy (Bacon 2004;Jena et al, 2012;Kilian et al, 2006).…”

Fairtrade and Sustainability: Motivations for Fairtrade Certification among Smallholder Coffee Growers in Tanzania

“…First, the majority of existing studies examine FT from the perspective of developed-country consumers, by focusing on consumer willingness to pay for FT-certified products [24][25][26] and their ethical buying behavior, including the determinants of buying environmental friendly and fairly traded products [27,28]. However, little is known about small coffee farmers' motivations for FT certification, as very few empirical studies have examined how various factors affect the probability of FT certification, in SSA countries in particular [21,28]. Second, much of the FT adoption literature focuses on socioeconomic and demographic factors associated with farms and farmers, while little attention has been paid to environmental motivations [29,30].…”