2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-011-9581-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of coding time on the estimation of school effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the field of EER, the development of three-level growth models has elicited a debate on whether schools have a larger effect on student status (intercept) than on student growth (slope) (Anumendem, De Fraine, Onghena, & Van Damme, 2013). Previous research has usually found that schools have a larger impact on their students' growth than on their students' outcomes at a certain point in time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of EER, the development of three-level growth models has elicited a debate on whether schools have a larger effect on student status (intercept) than on student growth (slope) (Anumendem, De Fraine, Onghena, & Van Damme, 2013). Previous research has usually found that schools have a larger impact on their students' growth than on their students' outcomes at a certain point in time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coding and location of the baseline of time scores have a significant impact on the estimation and interpretation of the growth parameter. 39,40 Different fit indexes were assessed to evaluate the models' goodness of fit. These include the comparative fit index (CFI), the Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and the standardized root mean square (SRMS).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of reasons why some observations might be absent in a study. When incomplete observations are missing at random or even completely at random, maximum likelihood estimates obtained from multilevel growth curve models [26] or the full maximum likelihood estimates for latent growth models [27], are still valid. However sometimes because of the design of the study, the statistical method used or the type of pupil outcomes to be considered, attritions occur in one outcome variable and not in the other.…”
Section: Bivariate Transition Multilevel Growth Curve Model (Btmgcm)mentioning
confidence: 99%