2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10147-020-01731-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of clinicopathological factors on clinical outcomes in patients with salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
16
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides that, positive neck nodes and lymphovascular invasion posed further risk factors for distant recurrences, which is in accordance to the work of Ali et al, who additionally identified male sex, high‐grade pathology, and perineural invasion as predictors of distant metastases 18 . Interestingly, overall recurrence rate and rate of distant failures were again comparable to other studies done on low‐grade salivary gland tumors 11,19,20 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Besides that, positive neck nodes and lymphovascular invasion posed further risk factors for distant recurrences, which is in accordance to the work of Ali et al, who additionally identified male sex, high‐grade pathology, and perineural invasion as predictors of distant metastases 18 . Interestingly, overall recurrence rate and rate of distant failures were again comparable to other studies done on low‐grade salivary gland tumors 11,19,20 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…[ 38 ] In contrast, a recent multi-institutional retrospective analysis in Japan showed that prophylactic neck dissection for the salivary glands ACC was not associated with better clinical outcomes in the 5 year observation periods. [ 39 ] Garg et al reviewed the literature and reported that prophylactic neck dissection for N0 cases in ACC can provide accurate cancer staging, prognostic prediction, and locoregional control, even if it does not contribute to overall survival. [ 36 ] With regard to the significance of postoperative radiotherapy, no consensus has been reached yet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported clinicopathological prognostic factors of salivary gland ACC are higher T and N classification, higher solid pattern components, and pathologically positive surgical margins. [ 4 , 39 , 45 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Park et al investigated the survival outcome of 108 intermediate-grade SGC patients in their study, from which the most common histologic type was MEC and ACC; the result suggested that a non-parotid primary site is an independent prognostic factor for poor RFS [ 64 ]. For ACC and SDC, patients with parotid gland tumors demonstrated more favorable survival outcomes [ 65 , 66 ], And a primary site in the submandibular gland was an independent prognostic factor for worse survival outcomes [ 63 , 67 ]. The tumor site (major and minor salivary gland) did not affect survival in Ca-ex-PA patients [ 68 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%