2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12349-012-0105-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of clinical nutrition on cancer therapy: a frequently underestimated perspective. A complementary approach to cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(11 reference statements)
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cancer patients who were nutritionally ‘at-risk’ had a lower likelihood of being reported as such. This finding is in agreement with a previous study which reported that undernutrition is underestimated among cancer patients [ 35 ] or to the fact that the impact of nutrition intervention on cancer therapy is frequently underestimated [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Cancer patients who were nutritionally ‘at-risk’ had a lower likelihood of being reported as such. This finding is in agreement with a previous study which reported that undernutrition is underestimated among cancer patients [ 35 ] or to the fact that the impact of nutrition intervention on cancer therapy is frequently underestimated [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Cachexia is strongly correlated with a poor quality of life, reduced tolerance of treatment and a shorter survival in many types of cancer including HNSCC (Aversa et al 2017; Couch et al 2015). However, a simple quantitative assessment of body weight can be misleading, because it does not provide the information on the body qualitative composition or the patient’s hydration status (Sukkar 2012). Moreover, the decrease in body weight alone, without taking into account the metabolic background, cannot predict early enough how large this decrease will be.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, it will be important to assess the impact of the diet and life style on PIN1 also in humans, and to validate PIN1 as a potential biomarker and target for metabolic diseases such as diabetes (123) and cancer. In this context, also the nutritional status of neoplastic patients might be an important issue to consider since it is associated with tolerability to conventional therapies (183). Moreover, given the impact of PIN1 in p53-dependent apoptosis, PIN1 based therapies could underlie also radiation- and chemotherapy induced sickness in healthy tissues, especially in those with high PIN1 levels (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%