2024
DOI: 10.1109/tem.2021.3121002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Carbon Emission Quota Allocation Regulations on the Investment of Low-Carbon Technology in Electric Power Industry Under Peak-Valley Price Policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They find that BM is more conducive to renewable energy investment than GM. Chen et al (2021b) discuss the carbon abatement technology investment under cap-and-trade mechanisms for an electricity supply chain with a peak-valley pricing policy. They find that the peak-valley pricing policy will encourage the electricity generator to invest more carbon abatement technology than the flat pricing policy.…”
Section: Carbon Abatement Innovation In the Electric Power Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They find that BM is more conducive to renewable energy investment than GM. Chen et al (2021b) discuss the carbon abatement technology investment under cap-and-trade mechanisms for an electricity supply chain with a peak-valley pricing policy. They find that the peak-valley pricing policy will encourage the electricity generator to invest more carbon abatement technology than the flat pricing policy.…”
Section: Carbon Abatement Innovation In the Electric Power Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the unit carbon quota ( e 0 ) under the benchmarking mechanism (BM)and the total carbon quota ( E i ) under the grandfathering mechanism (GM) for Firm i are restricted by the government,e 0 ≥ 0 and E i ≥ 0, a > max w(2bdi+ci(2b+di))dj ej −2bwdi(cj +dj )ei cidi(cj +dj ) , w(2bdi+ci(2b+di))dj ej −bwdi(cj +dj )ei (bdi(cj+dj)+ci(b+di)(cj+dj)) , i = 1, 2; j = 3 − i , as in Ji et al (2017) and Chen et al (2021b).…”
Section: Model Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the Power technology progress other hand, with the further increase of carbon emission reduction constraints, scholars believe that carbon emission reduction is an institutional constraint of electric power production and consumption. Especially in the market environment without adequate supervision, carbon emission reduction constraints are necessary to encourage economic entities to improve the utilization of electric energy (Chen et al, 2021;Pan et al, 2020). To confirm the constraint effect of carbon emission reduction on the utilization of electric power resources, scholars incorporate carbon emissions into the process of electric power consumption, construct an electric energy efficiency measurement model including unexpected output based on the total factor productivity framework and discuss the impact of carbon emission reduction constraints on electric power consumption (Sun et al, 2020;Chen et al, 2017;Li et al, 2014;Zheng, 2014;Sueyoshi and Goto, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decarbonization of industrial sectors, significant technological advances, improved efficiency, and increased affordability represent some of the main drivers for customers (and producer-consumers, also called 'prosumers') to acquire DER, mainly connected to LV distribution networks [3]. Technical constraints from DER are compounded with a low (or null) observability of LV electrical networks, which leads DNO to face unprecedented operational challenges [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%