2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11142-021-09611-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of carbon disclosure mandates on emissions and financial operating performance

Abstract: We examine the impact of a disclosure mandate for greenhouse gas emissions on firms’ subsequent emission levels and financial operating performance. For UK-incorporated listed firms a carbon disclosure mandate was adopted in 2013. Our difference-in-differences design shows that firms affected by the mandate reduced their emissions by about 8% relative to a control group of European firms. At the same time, our tests indicate that the treated firms experienced no significant changes in their gross margins. Take… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
54
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(53 reference statements)
7
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finding that the result differs somewhat for the three ratings is perhaps not surprising given that prior literature documents a significant divergence across these metrics, including their coverage (e.g., Berg et al, 2020). 26 Recalling our finding above that ESG disclosure mandates tend to make the adoption of ESG pay more likely, the results obtained for equation ( 6) are aligned with earlier findings that firms located in countries with mandatory carbon reporting achieve incrementally lower carbon emissions (Grewal, 2021;Downar et al 2021). 27 Beyond having a smaller coverage of our sample firms, KLD ratings are only readily available until 2018.…”
Section: Esg Ratingssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Finding that the result differs somewhat for the three ratings is perhaps not surprising given that prior literature documents a significant divergence across these metrics, including their coverage (e.g., Berg et al, 2020). 26 Recalling our finding above that ESG disclosure mandates tend to make the adoption of ESG pay more likely, the results obtained for equation ( 6) are aligned with earlier findings that firms located in countries with mandatory carbon reporting achieve incrementally lower carbon emissions (Grewal, 2021;Downar et al 2021). 27 Beyond having a smaller coverage of our sample firms, KLD ratings are only readily available until 2018.…”
Section: Esg Ratingssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Besides transparency for external stakeholders, binding mandates for scope 1 and 2 can also yield emission reductions without a negative effect on financial performance, as initial empirical evidence from the United Kingdom indicates 52 , 53 . Additionally, this would make it easier for companies to add up scope 1 and 2 emissions of all suppliers in order to obtain their scope 3 emissions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2017]), and for specific reporting outcomes such as greenhouse gas emissions (Jouvenot and Krueger, [2020], Downar et al. [2021], Tomar [2021]) or extraction payments (Rauter [2020]). Yet it is unclear whether and how these findings translate to other countries and industries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%