2020
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact Of Bundled Payment On Health Care Spending, Utilization, And Quality: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
104
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
104
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Disease phenomenon [21][22][23][24].In addition, DRGs also has some practices in China, but we think it is not suitable for China's county-level regions, especially the central and western regions where the economy and medical care are underdeveloped.Relatively speaking, the current stage of medical insurance informatization in these areas and the standardization of hospital information systems are uneven, which leads to inadequate supervision and brings di culties to the collection of large amounts of data required for DRGs coding.Second, after the implementation of DRGs, doctors may increase their income by over-diagnosing and changing the level of surgery, and cannot really save medical insurance funds; when facing the same price, patients are more likely to prefer county-level hospitals with better medical conditions. Nor can it change the current contradiction between countylevel hospitals and primary health service centers, which runs counter to the reform goals;The total prepaid execution cost is low, and it can effectively control the medical cost, but its disadvantage is that it is di cult to ensure the quality of medical treatment and may cause medical institutions to reject patients [25][26][27][28].The performance-based payment method is usually implemented together with other payment methods. The purpose is to control costs while ensuring the quality of medical services.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Medical Insurance Payment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disease phenomenon [21][22][23][24].In addition, DRGs also has some practices in China, but we think it is not suitable for China's county-level regions, especially the central and western regions where the economy and medical care are underdeveloped.Relatively speaking, the current stage of medical insurance informatization in these areas and the standardization of hospital information systems are uneven, which leads to inadequate supervision and brings di culties to the collection of large amounts of data required for DRGs coding.Second, after the implementation of DRGs, doctors may increase their income by over-diagnosing and changing the level of surgery, and cannot really save medical insurance funds; when facing the same price, patients are more likely to prefer county-level hospitals with better medical conditions. Nor can it change the current contradiction between countylevel hospitals and primary health service centers, which runs counter to the reform goals;The total prepaid execution cost is low, and it can effectively control the medical cost, but its disadvantage is that it is di cult to ensure the quality of medical treatment and may cause medical institutions to reject patients [25][26][27][28].The performance-based payment method is usually implemented together with other payment methods. The purpose is to control costs while ensuring the quality of medical services.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Medical Insurance Payment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forløpsbaserte finansieringsordninger for andre prosedyrer har gått i økonomisk balanse uten at kvaliteten forringes. Dette gjelder blant annet rygginngrep og koronare bypassoperasjoner (12).…”
Section: Prissetting Og Designunclassified
“…CMS's bundled payment program for joint replacement reduced Medicare spending by 1.6 percent from 2013-2016, while still maintaining or improving quality of care. 38,39 However, bundled payments for other clinical episodes such as spinal fusion surgery or heart failure have not shown evidence of reduced spending or quality improvement. 39 In addition, a bundled payment does not guarantee that the patient actually needs to undergo the procedure.…”
Section: Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38,39 However, bundled payments for other clinical episodes such as spinal fusion surgery or heart failure have not shown evidence of reduced spending or quality improvement. 39 In addition, a bundled payment does not guarantee that the patient actually needs to undergo the procedure. Theoretically, "global budgeting," or paying a hospital a set amount per year to care for a defined population of patients could provide an incentive for hospitals to reduce the delivery of unnecessary services, which would reduce costs.…”
Section: Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%