2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.19.436124
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of brain lesions on tDCS-induced electric field magnitude

Abstract: Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used to enhance motor and language rehabilitation following a stroke. However, improving the effectiveness of clinical tDCS protocols depends on understanding how a lesion may influence tDCS-induced current flow through the brain. Objective: We systematically investigated the effect of brain lesions on the magnitude of electric fields (e-mag) induced by tDCS. Methods: We simulated the effect of 630 different lesions - by varying lesion locatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(136 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ref. [ 44 ] achieved 0.16 V/m averaged electric field with high-definition electrodes Fp2-CCP3. For the frontal cortex, Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [ 44 ] achieved 0.16 V/m averaged electric field with high-definition electrodes Fp2-CCP3. For the frontal cortex, Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case report, for the first time, provides direct evidence for tES-induced EF in the lesioned human brain. Several previous modeling studies have studied the effect of lesions on tES-induced EF [ 9 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 28 , 29 , 30 ]. These simulated results mainly explore the situation of stroke patients and have found that lesions caused a shunt of stimulation current in target areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural changes that occur in degenerative disease such as dementia or ALS, or in acquired brain injury such as stroke, are also likely to have an impact on the distribution of current such that optimisation criteria for tES derived from healthy populations may no longer apply [60,61]. We know that changes in skull density, and in thickness of CSF and skull tissue [62,63], or the presence of lesions [61,64] will drastically alter E-field distribution.…”
Section: How Generalisable Are Cfms?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know that changes in skull density, and in thickness of CSF and skull tissue [62,63], or the presence of lesions [61,64] will drastically alter E-field distribution. For example, the presence of a lesion can result in either an increase or decrease in E-field magnitude in a region of interest, depending on the lesion location and size relative to the path of the current [60]. To add to this complexity, the conductances of lesioned tissue also remain unknown [60; 81].…”
Section: How Generalisable Are Cfms?mentioning
confidence: 99%