2002
DOI: 10.1108/01437730210441274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of behavioral style assessment on organizational effectiveness: a call for action

Abstract: Reviews the historical origins of behavioral style and overviews the most commonly used behavioral style assessment instruments. The perceived benefits of behavioral style assessments and their similarities to and differences from personality instruments are discussed. Suggests that research is needed to validate the perceived organizational benefits of using style assessments in the workplace. Research is also needed to validate the perceived impact of work style diversity among members of an organization on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One potential problem was that the directions ask HR respondents to report on "your personal work style, " which may lead respondents to gauge the broader concept of work style (e.g., McKenna, Shelton, & Darling, 2002) rather than behaviors in the credibility domain. Second, we could locate no general or HR-specific definitions of credibility in this research, and there are no published empirical studies of the items and factor structures underlying the credibility dimensions.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One potential problem was that the directions ask HR respondents to report on "your personal work style, " which may lead respondents to gauge the broader concept of work style (e.g., McKenna, Shelton, & Darling, 2002) rather than behaviors in the credibility domain. Second, we could locate no general or HR-specific definitions of credibility in this research, and there are no published empirical studies of the items and factor structures underlying the credibility dimensions.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is growing empirical evidence that personality factors (either in the leader and/or followers) impact team performance (Judge & Bono, 2000; Judge, Bono, Ilies, & Gerhardt, 2002; Lim & Ployhart, 2004; Manning, 2003; McKenna, Shelton, & Darling, 2002; Ng, Ang, & Chan, 2008; Sankar, 2003; Sosik, 2005; Strang, 2009a). There is also a valid counterargument that personality instruments may not be reliable measures of leadership (Capraro & Capraro, 2002; Furnham, 1996; Kinder & Robertson, 1994; Michael, 2003).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Karasek's job demand-control model, strain occurs when high job demands combine with low opportunity to influence tasks and procedures, resulting in poor employee health and low job satisfaction (Bridger et al, 2007). Heavy workload (McKenna et al, 2002;Nwadiani, 2006), infrequent rest breaks, long working hours and shift work; hectic and routine tasks that have little inherent meaning, do not utilize workers' skills, and provide little sense of control (Fairbrother & Warn, 2003). Locus of control and self-efficacy may have a major impact on perceived stressors and resultant stress (Kenny, 1999;Fevre et al, 2003;Love et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%