2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of axillary ultrasound with biopsy in overtreatment of early breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the initial method of detecting metastatic LNs would have little influence on patient outcomes if their nodal status is fixed based on the final pathological examination. That assumption is parallel to the previous attempts to expand the Z0011 strategy based on preoperative imaging and/or image-guided cytology [12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In addition, the initial method of detecting metastatic LNs would have little influence on patient outcomes if their nodal status is fixed based on the final pathological examination. That assumption is parallel to the previous attempts to expand the Z0011 strategy based on preoperative imaging and/or image-guided cytology [12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Axillary US alone has a relatively low NPV and sensitivity to be useful as a predictor of axillary nodal burden [83,84]. When combined with needle biopsy, however, the sensitivity improves from 61% to 79% in a meta-analysis of 21 studies [54,62,85]. US-guided core needle biopsy was superior to US-guided FNA in a meta-analysis of 1,353 patients with newly diagnosed invasive breast carcinoma, with a reported sensitivity of 88% for core biopsy and 74% for FNA [86].…”
Section: Discussion Of Procedures By Variantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the temporal validation cohort, the radiomics model also demonstrated the AUC value of 0.77 for predicting the probability of high axillary tumor burden. Previous studies took advantage of axillary ultrasound to identify axillary metastasis preoperatively for breast cancer patients ( 10 , 48 ). However, axillary ultrasound does not accurately differentiate between low and high axillary tumor burden ( 49 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, after the ACOSOG Z0011 trial, the assessment of lymph node status is no longer limited to axillary metastasis but more focused on the axillary tumor burden that indicates the extent of lymph node involvement ( 10 ). If the patient has four or more positive ALNs, that is considered as high axillary tumor burden.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%