“…Having opened this paper with a historical introduction on the stratification of education and the utilitarian rationale behind the teaching of reading, writing and arithmetic to the working‐classes, we now return to note the sharp divisions between more or less powerful types of knowledge and curricula (Wheelahan, 2007, 2010; Young, 2008; Young, 2010a, 2010b; Young & Muller, 2013, 2015), more or less powerful preparatory routes to Higher Education (Taylor et al , 2013a, 2013b; Yhnell et al , 2016), more or less powerful Higher Education institutions whose graduates can expect higher earnings and higher‐status jobs (Bratti et al , 2004; Power & Whitty, 2008) and more or less powerful sectors of the economy which are characterised by value‐added intellectual and professional efforts. The move from ‘elite’ to ‘mass’ and to ‘universal’ upper‐secondary can be illusionary as this move may be a disguised domino effect (Green et al , 1999, p. 30) in the face of expanding secondary and tertiary education systems.…”