2021
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of atrial fibrillation and stroke risk factors on left atrial blood flow characteristics

Abstract: Aims  Altered left atrial (LA) blood flow characteristics account for an increase in cardioembolic stroke risk in atrial fibrillation (AF). Here, we aimed to assess whether exposure to stroke risk factors is sufficient to alter LA blood flow even in the presence of sinus rhythm (SR). Methods and results  We investigated 95 individuals: 37 patients with persistent AF, who were studied before and after cardioversion [Group 1; m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,5 Rapidity of recovery of mechanical atrial systole may be influenced by clinical variables, 37 duration of the antecedent AF episode leading to cardioversion, 5 and the extent of comorbid conditions as risks factors for atrial myopathy. 38…”
Section: Rhythm Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Rapidity of recovery of mechanical atrial systole may be influenced by clinical variables, 37 duration of the antecedent AF episode leading to cardioversion, 5 and the extent of comorbid conditions as risks factors for atrial myopathy. 38…”
Section: Rhythm Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarkably, stasis can also be quantified for blood in the left atrium and the left atrial appendage. 33 Because LV systolic dysfunction, atrial myopathy and disturbed intra-atrial flow are very prevalent in patients with embolic stroke of unknown source, 34 stasis imaging may be also useful in this condition. Stasis imaging may also provide insight on the relationship between subclinical LV systolic dysfunction and silent cerebrovascular disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with a primary endpoint showed larger myocardial infarct size by CMR than those patients without endpoint (32 [29-37]% vs. 21 [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]% of total myocardial mass, respectively p= 0.04). Enrollment echocardiographic examinations showed lower values of EF in patients with a primary endpoint (38 [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]%) than in those without endpoint (42 [36-51]%, p= 0.02). Also, apical strain was higher in patients with a primary endpoint than in those free of events: -4.7 [-7.2--3.6] vs -7.9 [-10.1--6.0]% (p< 0.01).…”
Section: Imaging Predictors Of the Primary Endpointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LA peak velocity and vorticity were found to be more reproducible and independent of physiological biomarkers than LA mean velocity, LA vortex volume, and blood flow stasis. There was an approach to associate risk factors with LA flow characteristics [46]. This study presented patients with moderate to high CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores have impaired LA flow parameters even though they have restored from arrhythmia or have no AF history.…”
Section: Study Cohorts Size (N) Flow Parameters Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%