The impact of Artificial Intelligence in academia: Views of Turkish academics on ChatGPT

Inteligencia Artificial en Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura: experiencias de estudiantes en el contexto universitario

“…Este fenómeno de aceptación acrítica de resultados de IA podría ser considerado incluso como plagio, siendo también preocupante que puede limitar el desarrollo de habilidades fundamentales en los estudiantes según advierten algunos autores (Livberber & Ayvaz, 2023;Queiros et al, 2023). Es necesario recalcar, tanto en el currículum como en la práctica educativa, que la IA debería emplearse como un apoyo al proceso de investigación y no para reemplazar por completo al factor humano en actividades que requieren interpretación, contextualización y validación de información.…”

“…Por ello, un enfoque balanceado entre automatización con IA y desarrollo de capacidades humanas sigue siendo esencial para la conformación de los saberes necesarios en los futuros profesionales (Livberber & Ayvaz, 2023). Sólo de esta manera se pueden obtener los beneficios de eficiencia de la IA al tiempo que se preservan habilidades humanas indispensables.…”

Expectation management in AI: A framework for understanding stakeholder trust and acceptance of artificial intelligence systems

“…In education, AI has been applied to predict applicant success, identify students at risk of failure early in their studies, personalize instruction, and assess student understanding [ [88] , [89] , [90] ]. The increased use of conversational natural language processing AI systems such as ChatGPT by students has resulted in increased enthusiasm for AI use in educational settings, as well as increased concerns about issues such as response quality, plagiarism, cheating, and user privacy [ 91 , 92 ]. Because of the many issues and potential benefits in these fields, end users of AI systems for healthcare and education were selected to validate the framework, as they are likely to have diverse expectations and concerns for the development of AI systems.…”

Artificial intelligence in academic writing and clinical pharmacy education: consequences and opportunities

“…The ongoing debate within the scientific and academic community centres mainly around ethical considerations of academic integrity such as plagiarism. Critics argue that the use of AI in academic writing undermines the authenticity of scholarly work, potentially leading to plagiarism or the erosion of original thought and critical thinking skills [ 9 ]. Claiming authorship for AI generated content is also a widely debated topic as, legally speaking, artificial intelligence models cannot be responsible for the content they create [ 10 ].…”