2023
DOI: 10.1002/clc.24013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of antihypertensive treatment of mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes: An updated meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract: Currently, there is controversy regarding the treatment of pregnant patients with mild hypertension (blood pressure 140–159/90–109 mm Hg). While guidelines do not recommend this treatment, results from recent clinical trials are supportive of the treatment. This meta‐analysis aimed to clarify if active treatment of mild hypertension during pregnancy results in better maternal and fetal outcomes. All of the potentially eligible randomized controlled trials were retrieved through a systematic database search inv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Tita et al reported that active treatment of pregnant women for mild hypertension (<160/100 mmHg), achieving a BP of <140/90 mmHg, did not increase the prevalence of SGA among their offspring compared to that of the offspring of pregnant women not receiving such treatment [ 16 ]. There is an update meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial that antihypertensive treatment was associated with better outcomes in maternal complications and neonatal mortality for pregnant women with mild hypertension (140–159/90–109 mmHg), without increased a chance of SGA [ 17 ]. Our results that the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes was high in uncontrolled BP might support those findings that BP during pregnancy should be controlled to <140/90 mmHg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Tita et al reported that active treatment of pregnant women for mild hypertension (<160/100 mmHg), achieving a BP of <140/90 mmHg, did not increase the prevalence of SGA among their offspring compared to that of the offspring of pregnant women not receiving such treatment [ 16 ]. There is an update meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial that antihypertensive treatment was associated with better outcomes in maternal complications and neonatal mortality for pregnant women with mild hypertension (140–159/90–109 mmHg), without increased a chance of SGA [ 17 ]. Our results that the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes was high in uncontrolled BP might support those findings that BP during pregnancy should be controlled to <140/90 mmHg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results showed higher use of antihypertensives in the first trimester among pregnancies with chronic hypertension, in agreement with the guidelines; however, to date, there is no consensus on the BP values to start antihypertensive medication for pregnancies with BP < 160/90 mmHg. Two recently published meta-analyses have shown better outcomes for pregnancies receiving antihypertensive medications, and a network meta-analysis showed that even if all antihypertensives reduce the risk of severe hypertension, labetalol may also decrease proteinuria/preeclampsia and fetal/newborn death ( Bone et al, 2022 ; Attar et al, 2023 ). The boundaries for BP values for when to start medication are uncertain, making this area suitable for shared decision making (SDM), with some research focusing in developing tools for SDM in women with moderate hypertension ( Whybrow et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frontiers in Pharmacology frontiersin.org may also decrease proteinuria/preeclampsia and fetal/newborn death (Bone et al, 2022;Attar et al, 2023). The boundaries for BP values for when to start medication are uncertain, making this area suitable for shared decision making (SDM), with some research focusing in developing tools for SDM in women with moderate hypertension (Whybrow et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%