The impact of ankle–foot orthoses on toe clearance strategy in hemiparetic gait: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

BackgroundAnkle–foot orthoses (AFOs) are frequently used to improve gait stability, toe clearance, and gait efficiency in individuals with hemiparesis. During the swing phase, AFOs enhance lower limb advancement by facilitating the improvement of toe clearance and the reduction of compensatory movements. Clinical monitoring via kinematic analysis would further clarify the changes in biomechanical factors that lead to the beneficial effects of AFOs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the actual impact of AFOs on toe clearance, and determine the best strategy to achieve toe clearance (including compensatory movements) during the swing phase.MethodsThis study included 24 patients with hemiparesis due to stroke. The gait performance of these patients with and without AFOs was compared using three-dimensional treadmill gait analysis. A kinematic analysis of the paretic limb was performed to quantify the contribution of the extent of lower limb shortening and compensatory movements (such as hip elevation and circumduction) to toe clearance. The impact of each movement related to toe clearance was assessed by analyzing the change in the vertical direction.ResultsUsing AFOs significantly increased toe clearance (p = 0.038). The quantified limb shortening and pelvic obliquity significantly differed between gaits performed with versus without AFOs. Among the movement indices related to toe clearance, limb shortening was increased by the use of AFOs (p < 0.0001), while hip elevation due to pelvic obliquity (representing compensatory strategies) was diminished by the use of AFOs (p = 0.003). The toe clearance strategy was not significantly affected by the stage of the hemiparetic condition (acute versus chronic) or the type of AFO (thermoplastic AFOs versus adjustable posterior strut AFOs).ConclusionsSimplified three-dimensional gait analysis was successfully used to quantify and visualize the impact of AFOs on the toe clearance strategy of hemiparetic patients. AFO use increased the extent of toe clearance and limb shortening during the swing phase, while reducing compensatory movements. This approach to visualization of the gait strategy possibly contributes to clinical decision-making in the real clinical settings.Trial registrationUMIN000028946. Registered 31 August 2017 (retrospectively registered).Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12984-018-0382-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Machine learning classifies predictive kinematic features in a mouse model of neurodegeneration

“…To evaluate locomotion, we considered three important qualities: (1) the path of each body part throughout the stepping cycle; (2) the synergy among different body parts during locomotion; and (3) the patterns indicating stability of locomotion compared to normal gait 71 – 76 . Based on these qualities, trajectory-based and angle-based analyses were applied to extract kinematic features (Table 1 ).…”

Effect of ankle-foot orthosis on level walking in healthy subjects

“…A total of 12 reflective markers (6 on each side) were attached to (1) acromion, (2) greater trochanter, (3) lateral epicondyle of the femur, (4) lateral malleolus of the fibula, (5) head of the fifth metatarsal, and (6) calcaneal tuberosity, based on literature. 17 The last two markers were placed on the corresponding surface positions of the shoes. The two markers are placed approximately on the same height.…”

A Review on the Control of the Mechanical Properties of Ankle Foot Orthosis for Gait Assistance

“…Examples of the qualitative terms used to represent the stiffness levels include flexible, semi-rigid, and rigid [24]. Although, the flexible rigid AFO has no effect on the power output of the limb in the horizontal axis [25], it affects the power output in the vertical axis because of unnecessary restrictions on the plantar flexion, which is comparable to the rigid AFO [15,26]. Meanwhile, the articulated AFO is equipped with an actuator for controlling the mechanical properties according to the gait control strategy, and thus, it is more useful compared to the flexible rigid and rigid AFOs [27].…”

“…Less restriction on the plantar flexion was achieved without decreasing the dorsiflexion assistance. However, the flexible rigid AFO was unable to replicate normal walking [15]. Then, the articulated AFO was developed with certain actuators installed on it, to control the mechanical properties of the AFO, thus producing a normal walking gait to help in training users.…”