2019
DOI: 10.1086/705235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Animal Welfare and Environmental Information on the Choice of Organic Fish: An Empirical Investigation of German Trout Consumers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the appearance (freshness, presentation, etc), Almendarez-Hernández et al (2017), Can et al (2015), Hall and Amberg (2013), Kumar et al (2008) and Yousuf et al (2019) found similar results for fresh products, with higher consumer consumption rates than other presentations. Other studies have stated that consumers are willing to pay more for fresh seafood presentations than for other frozen presentations (Ankamah-Yeboah et al, 2019Bronnmann and Asche, 2017;Davidson et al, 2012), while specifically for farmed salmon, consumers are willing to pay more for redder colour options, even after knowing that the red colour is artificially added (Alfnes et al, 2006;Olesen et al, 2010Olesen et al, , 2006Steine et al, 2005). Moreover, other studies have found that fillet presentation is preferred over whole fish (Ankamah-Yeboah et al, 2019 and steak (Thong et al, 2015) presentations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concerning the appearance (freshness, presentation, etc), Almendarez-Hernández et al (2017), Can et al (2015), Hall and Amberg (2013), Kumar et al (2008) and Yousuf et al (2019) found similar results for fresh products, with higher consumer consumption rates than other presentations. Other studies have stated that consumers are willing to pay more for fresh seafood presentations than for other frozen presentations (Ankamah-Yeboah et al, 2019Bronnmann and Asche, 2017;Davidson et al, 2012), while specifically for farmed salmon, consumers are willing to pay more for redder colour options, even after knowing that the red colour is artificially added (Alfnes et al, 2006;Olesen et al, 2010Olesen et al, , 2006Steine et al, 2005). Moreover, other studies have found that fillet presentation is preferred over whole fish (Ankamah-Yeboah et al, 2019 and steak (Thong et al, 2015) presentations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, according to the literature, the origin of the product is also an important determinant for consumers' decisions on seafood, with consumers having a higher willingness to pay for domestic or local products than for imported products (Ankamah-Yeboah et al, 2019Ariji, 2010;Davidson et al, 2012;Fernández-Polanco et al, 2013;Hinkes and Schulze-Ehlers, 2018;Lim et al, 2018;Mauracher et al, 2013;Rudd et al, 2011;Stefani et al, 2012;Thong et al, 2015;Uchida et al, 2014;van Osch et al, 2019van Osch et al, , 2017Witkin et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The freshness of the product is important as sometimes it is associated with its quality [ 6 ]. In the literature, several studies have shown a general preference and greater willingness to pay for fresh products over other types of presentations [ 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 ]. A study found that freshness was the most important attribute for farmed seabream consumption in Portugal [ 62 ], while another study in Europe found that one of the most important reasons for buying local and European products was its greater freshness [ 71 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, several studies have studied the possible acceptance of animal welfare labels and claims [24,25,32,33]. In Norway, two studies identified a preference and higher willingness to pay (WTP) for animal welfare-labeled salmon (Freedom Food salmon) compared to conventional salmon with the same color [24,25].…”
Section: Animal Welfare Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%