2018 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/isecon.2018.8340489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of an integrated Pre-K STEM curriculum on teachers' engineering content knowledge, self-efficacy, and teaching practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diversity of expertise, a shared goal, and mutual respect that each member had for others on the team enabled the creation of innovative units. The iterative process of testing-feedback-revision-testing resulted in a high-quality curriculum that has been recently piloted in additional preschool classrooms to assess the potential impacts of the curriculum on teacher and student outcomes (Sibuma et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diversity of expertise, a shared goal, and mutual respect that each member had for others on the team enabled the creation of innovative units. The iterative process of testing-feedback-revision-testing resulted in a high-quality curriculum that has been recently piloted in additional preschool classrooms to assess the potential impacts of the curriculum on teacher and student outcomes (Sibuma et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central to each of these studies is a set of developmentally-appropriate engineering activities that allow parents and young children to access and engage in engineering practices. While there are now options for pre-kindergarten engineering curriculum packages and activities [19], [35] and design principles outlined for K-12 engineering experiences [36], most are intended for traditional classroom contexts with a teacher or early childhood educator facilitating groups of young students moving through a structured set of lessons. Given our focus on family learning and engagement around engineering, it was essential to create and refine activities that were flexible, accessible, and able to be used without educator facilitation.…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%