2021
DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.13497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of an electronic hospital system on therapeutic drug monitoring

Abstract: What is known and objective: Australian hospitals have undergone a transformation with both a review and expansion of traditional roles of healthcare professionals and the implementation of an ieMR. The implementation of an ieMR brings large scale organizational change within the health system especially for staff with direct patient contact. This is changing the future of healthcare and the roles of healthcare professionals. There is minimal research on the impact of these electronic systems on the

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from the study indicated that having a pharmacist order the required pathology for vancomycin TDM increased the odds of an appropriate sample (OR = 87.1). These findings build on our previous findings which showed that samples for TDM were more likely to be appropriate if the pharmacist had provided relevant written advice (i.e., documenting when a pathology sample was required for the medical officer) (OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.4-2.9) [13]. Here, we have demonstrated further improvement with greater pharmacist involvement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results from the study indicated that having a pharmacist order the required pathology for vancomycin TDM increased the odds of an appropriate sample (OR = 87.1). These findings build on our previous findings which showed that samples for TDM were more likely to be appropriate if the pharmacist had provided relevant written advice (i.e., documenting when a pathology sample was required for the medical officer) (OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.4-2.9) [13]. Here, we have demonstrated further improvement with greater pharmacist involvement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…A recent retrospective review of TDM at one hospital in Australia (13) revealed that the current TDM workflow may not be optimal, and the role of the pharmacist in this process may not be fully utilised. The authors found that TDM samples were more likely to be taken at the appropriate time if the pharmacist had provided advice, whereas this was not the case for appropriate dose adjustment, suggesting the need for greater education and training [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent Australian study showed the transition from a paper-based to a digital system (ieMR) had no significant impact on two areas of interest; those being appropriate sample collection for TDM and appropriate dose adjustment. However, the study also showed that, overall, regardless of the type of system, the odds of an appropriate sample being taken for TDM increased with pharmacist involvement [ 30 ]. With this impact of pharmacists documented in the literature, there are opportunities in the future for expanding the scope and role of pharmacists in areas including pharmacist-managed TDM programs within the Australian hospital and health service, giving them responsibility for ordering pathology, and prescribing subsequent medication doses based on their clinical review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we aimed to build a simplified XGBoost model to develop an easy-to-use MIPD tool. Considering that the values of some predictors were missing owing to infrequent measurements during TDM (e.g., ALB) or were inaccurate clinical data (e.g., inappropriate sampling time in the TDM practice and irregular single doses or dosing intervals in the prescriptions) ( Jakobsen et al, 2017 ; Firman et al, 2021 ), we built a simplified model by omitting these types of features (i.e., Single Dose, ALB, , ) in the final, combined dataset. We developed an easy-to-use model in the clinic by using only CYP2C19 genotypes and some noninvasive clinical parameters as predictors, and observed the influence of the omitted predictors on the performance of the proposed XGBoost model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%