2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of ambient ozone pollution on pneumonia: A nationwide time-series analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact was observed even in Bogotá in spite of the seasonal pattern in the time series of attentions in this city [Additional le 2]. This reduction in the number of attentions in 2015 coincided with a decrease in the gross domestic product of Colombia and it is consistent with the relationship observed by other authors between pneumonia and economic growth measured as gross domestic product [49,50]. In the case of Colombia, the country experienced a contraction of its economy in 2015 as result of the reduction in oil prices [51], the country's main export.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This fact was observed even in Bogotá in spite of the seasonal pattern in the time series of attentions in this city [Additional le 2]. This reduction in the number of attentions in 2015 coincided with a decrease in the gross domestic product of Colombia and it is consistent with the relationship observed by other authors between pneumonia and economic growth measured as gross domestic product [49,50]. In the case of Colombia, the country experienced a contraction of its economy in 2015 as result of the reduction in oil prices [51], the country's main export.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…After removing 835 studies during title and abstract screening, 103 were selected for full-text review, and 82 studies were excluded for the following reasons: reviews or letter (n = 4), different outcomes (n = 3), combined outcomes (n = 31), irrelevant studies (n = 10), not providing short-term effects (n = 3), not providing overall effects (n = 10), conducted in children (n = 1), unable to extract data (n = 1), and overlapping studies (n = 19). Finally, 21 studies were included for meta-analysis [9,10,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ranges of increase were 0.9-1.1% for PM 2.5 , 0.4-0.5% for PM 10 , and 2.4-4.0% for NO 2 . When excluding the three largest studies, which had more than 1 million cases [10,37,38], the pooled % increase of hospital admission or ER visit per 10 μg/m 3 increase in PM 2.5 and PM 10 and 10 ppb in O 3 was 1.1% (95% CI: 0.6-1.6; I 2 = 46.5%), 0.5% (95% CI: 0.3-0.7; I 2 = 0%), and 5.5% (95% CI: -1.1-2.2; I 2 = 56%), respectively. As there were six and five studies for PM 2.5 conducted in North America and East Asia, respectively, we performed a subgroup analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground-level ozone (O3) is one of major air pollutants that has negative impacts on human health and can result in eye and nose irritation, respiratory disease, and lung function impairment (Jerrett et al, 2009;Khaniabadi et al, 2017;Huang et al, 2018). Tian et al (2020b) observed increased admissions for pneumonia associated with O3 exposure, especially for elderly people. In addition, it also has important impacts on climate as a greenhouse gas by absorbing thermal radiation (Fishman et al, 1979;IPCC, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%