2002
DOI: 10.1111/1468-5957.00428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Acquisitions on Operating Performance: Some Australian Evidence

Abstract: This study investigates the impact of acquisitions on the operating performance of Australian firms. For a sample of 36 Australian acquisitions occurring between 1986 to 1991 inclusive, and using matched firms to control for industry and economy-wide factors, the results based on four accrual and four cash flow performance measures show that corporate acquisitions do not lead to significant improvements in post-acquisition operating performance. The consistency of the results with the agency, the hubris and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
215
3
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(253 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
28
215
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Such results have also been supported by many other scholars, such as Manson et al (2000), Heron and Lie (2002), and Powell and Stark (2005) for domestic M&A. In contrast, Sharma and Ho (2002) and Bouwman et al (2009) showed that more than 50% of the sample companies experienced losses during the M&A year and the two years after the M&A deal.…”
Section: Operating Performance Methodologysupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Such results have also been supported by many other scholars, such as Manson et al (2000), Heron and Lie (2002), and Powell and Stark (2005) for domestic M&A. In contrast, Sharma and Ho (2002) and Bouwman et al (2009) showed that more than 50% of the sample companies experienced losses during the M&A year and the two years after the M&A deal.…”
Section: Operating Performance Methodologysupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Capron (1999), Sharma and Ho (2002) and Dutton and Jog (2009) found no effect of (market-)relatedness on the economic performance of M&As. An older study by Singh and Montgomery (1987) based on 105 US firms in the period 1975-1980 found a positive effect of market-relatedness on the profitability of M&As.…”
Section: Basic Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Theoretically, there is a number of reasons why a company could increase its performance through M&A such as synergies (Larsson & Finkelstein, 1999), economies of scope and scale (Pangarkar & Lim, 2003), and greater market monopoly (Ikeda & Doi, 1983;Lubatkin, 1983;Sharma & Ho, 2002). In reality, many firms may suffer a decrease in performance from an M&A activity, as companies face several obstacles which prevent such benefits from being properly executed (Chakrabarti, 1990;Fang, Fridh, & Schultzberg, 2004;Ivancevich, Schweiger, & Power, 1987;Nahavandi & Malekzadeh, 1988;Schweiger & Denisi, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%