2022
DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.782914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Academic Publication: Inequity for Women in Behavior Analytic Journals

Abstract: The number of women in higher education has increased over the past few decades but are still not at an equal level to their male counterparts, especially at the tenured level. One area of note within the tenure process is research. This area is highly valued by certain universities and could shed light on discrepancies in the number of female faculty as the faculty position becomes more prestigious. The author downloaded 21 years of publication data for seven prestigious behavior analytic journals and used qu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was also corroborated by another study (Lerman et al, 2022). In psychology, a similar trend is observed, with fewer females in first or last authorships (Krebsbach, 2022). However, another study highlighted that these differences might be explained by confounding factors, such as self-citation and total number of authors, at least in medicine (Andersen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This was also corroborated by another study (Lerman et al, 2022). In psychology, a similar trend is observed, with fewer females in first or last authorships (Krebsbach, 2022). However, another study highlighted that these differences might be explained by confounding factors, such as self-citation and total number of authors, at least in medicine (Andersen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…What about the pool of reviewers? Card et al (2020) find no impact of this in the journals they examined, but others question the dominant role of males in the review process (Krebsbach, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%