The impact of Aboriginal landscape burning on the Australian biota

Abstract

One of the most complex and contentious issues in Australian ecology concerns the environmental impact of Aboriginal landscape burning. This issue is not only important for the development of a comprehensive understanding of the dynamics and evolution of the Australian biota, but is central to the formulation of appropriate strategies for the conservation of the nation's biodiversity. Ethnographic evidence leaves little doubt that Aboriginal burning played a central role in the maintenance of the landscapes subsequently colonized by Europeans. Both 19th century European colonists and anthropologists in the 20th century documented the indispensability of fire as a tool in traditional Aboriginal economies, which have aptly been described as ‘fire‐stick farming’. Aborigines used fire to achieve short‐term outcomes such as providing favourable habitats for herbivores or increasing the local abundance of food plants, but it is not clear whether or not Aborigines had a predictive ecological knowledge of the long‐term consequences of their use of fire. A large body of ecological evidence suggests that Aboriginal burning resulted in substantial changes in the geographic range and demographic structure of many vegetation types. Aboriginal burning was important in creating habitat mosaics that favoured the abundance of some mammal species and in the maintenance of infrequently burnt habitats upon which the survival of specialized fauna depends. Aboriginal fire regimes were probably critical for the maintenance of at least one species of tree (Callitris intratropica) in the monsoon tropics. The question of the original impact of humans on the Australian environment is fundamentally speculative because of vague, disputed time frames proposed for the waves of colonization and shifting settlement patterns of Aborigines in the late Quaternary period. There is an inherent circular argument concerning the cause and effect of climate change, vegetation change, and burning through the late Quaternary. Charcoal and pollen evidence from long sedimentary cores is ambiguous and cannot be used to demonstrate unequivocally the initial impact of Aboriginal people on the landscapes of Pleistocene Australia. The sparse available evidence does not support the hypotheses that Aboriginal burning was primarily responsible for the extinction of Pleistocene megafauna; was critical for the maintenance of habitats of small mammals that have become extinct following European colonization; initiated widespread accelerated soil erosion rates in either the Pleistocene or Holocene; or forced the evolutionary diversification of the Australian biota. Burning may have caused the extinction of some fire‐sensitive species of plants and animals dependent upon infrequently burnt habitats, and it must have maintained structurally open vegetation such as grasslands and also extended the range of fire‐adapted species, such as Eucalyptus, into environments climatically suitable for rain forest. Palaeoecological research concerning prior impacts of Aborigines must ...

Canopy Structure, Microclimate, and Habitat Selection by a Nocturnal Snake, Hoplocephalus Bungaroides

“…The first is whether there is indeed a trend toward increasing vegetation density in southeastern Australia, as hypothesized by Flannery (1994). Nevertheless, it is generally accepted that burning was used extensively by Aborigines as a land management tool (Bowman 1998). This is a difficult hypothesis to address quantitatively, and efforts to address it qualitatively (by interpreting the journals of early explorers; e.g., Ryan et al 1995, Benson andRedpath 1997) have been subjective, acrimonious, and inconclusive.…”

Effects of fire, grazing and topographic variation on vegetation structure in tallgrass prairie

“…In grasslands, plant communities are primarily influenced by a combination of biotic and abiotic factors including fire (Sauer ; Wright & Bailey ; Gibson ; Collins & Gibson ; Noy‐Meir ; Bowman ; Collins & Steinauer ), grazing (Axelrod ; Milchunas et al. ; Vinton & Hartnett ; Vinton et al.…”

Habitat management by aboriginals promotes high spider diversity on an Asian tropical island

“…The use of fire by Australian aboriginals and impact on plant and animal diversities has received some attention. The habitat mosaic generated enhanced the survival of certain fauna and flora in the monsoon tropics of Australia (Bowman 1998). The habitat mosaic generated enhanced the survival of certain fauna and flora in the monsoon tropics of Australia (Bowman 1998).…”

“…How aboriginal human activities impact tropical biodiversity is poorly understood outside of Australia and the tropical Amazon (Phillips et al 1994, Bowman 1998). Zent and Zent (2002) suggested that disturbances caused by the Hoti people of the Venezuelan Amazon might have a considerable impact on the biodiversity of the Magigualida forest.…”