“…Much of the existing literature on sexual assault kits has focused on medical practitioners who use the kit, and the settings and effects of sexual assault kit evidence in legal cases of sexual assault. More specifically, this literature has spanned topics that include the development and effectiveness of professional groups associated with sexual assault kits (Campbell et al, 2005; Du Mont and Parnis, 2003; Sievers et al, 2003; Stermac and Stirpe, 2002), institutional settings and practices around forensic sexual assault kit exams (Hatmaker et al, 2002; Rees, 2010; Sampsel et al, 2009), and the effects of sexual assault kits on arrest and conviction rates (Campbell et al, 2009; Feldberg, 1997; Johnson et al, 2012; McGregor et al, 2002). Literature on sexual assault kit backlogs specifically has focused on institutional practices that contribute to kit backlogs (Campbell et al, 2015; Patterson and Campbell, 2012; Telsavaara and Arrigo, 2006), the value of testing backlogged kits (Fallik and Wells, 2015; Wells, 2016), and the consequences of kit backlogs on victims and the criminal justice system (Hansen, 2010; O’Connor, 2003; Peterson et al, 2012; Spohn, 2016).…”