2021
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of a multidisciplinary small renal mass clinic on patient treatment decisions

Abstract: Introduction: Small renal masses (SRMs) are managed with active surveillance (AS), thermal ablation (TA), irreversible electroporation (IRE), or surgery, depending on patient and tumor factors. A novel SRM multidisciplinary clinic (SRMC), involving urologists and interventional radiologists, was established to provide patients with information on treatments options. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the SRMC on treatment decision-making Methods: Demographics, tumor characteristics, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I n the study by Earis in this month's issue of CUAJ, patients with a small renal mass (SRM) attending a multidisciplinary clinic, comprised of a urologist and interventional radiologist, made different management choices than a historical cohort of patients primarily managed by a urologist alone. 1 Notably, almost 50% of patients in the multidisciplinary clinic cohort selected thermal ablation or irreversible electroporation therapy compared to 12.7% selecting these treatments historically. Consequently, the rate of active surveillance and surgery decreased for patients seen in the multidisciplinary clinic.…”
Section: See Related Article On Page 35mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I n the study by Earis in this month's issue of CUAJ, patients with a small renal mass (SRM) attending a multidisciplinary clinic, comprised of a urologist and interventional radiologist, made different management choices than a historical cohort of patients primarily managed by a urologist alone. 1 Notably, almost 50% of patients in the multidisciplinary clinic cohort selected thermal ablation or irreversible electroporation therapy compared to 12.7% selecting these treatments historically. Consequently, the rate of active surveillance and surgery decreased for patients seen in the multidisciplinary clinic.…”
Section: See Related Article On Page 35mentioning
confidence: 99%