1983
DOI: 10.2307/3053350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of a Crime Wave: Perceptions, Fear, and Confidence in the Police

Abstract: In 1980, Phoenix, Arizona, experienced a “crime wave.” A structural equation model based on a two-wave survey of the population shows that the crime wave had a powerful impact that was almost a mirror image of what the fear of crime literature would predict. Demographic groups thought to be most fearful (e.g., women and the elderly) were least affected while groups thought to be least fearful (e.g., well-educated whites) were affected most. In addition to demographic factors, our analysis demonstrates that cri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
4

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, fear of and perceived vulnerability to crime has been found to be influenced by media coverage of crime. [54][55][56][57][58][59][60] Thus, media coverage of homicide but less often robbery and assault may result in a greater awareness of and perceived vulnerability to area homicide compared to those other crimes and partly explain our finding that only homicide was associated with later stage at diagnosis. Unfortunately, we are unable to test these ideas with our data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, fear of and perceived vulnerability to crime has been found to be influenced by media coverage of crime. [54][55][56][57][58][59][60] Thus, media coverage of homicide but less often robbery and assault may result in a greater awareness of and perceived vulnerability to area homicide compared to those other crimes and partly explain our finding that only homicide was associated with later stage at diagnosis. Unfortunately, we are unable to test these ideas with our data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceived neighborhood quality was assessed using three questions. The first two questions were adapted from the scale of perceived neighborhood disorders developed by Ross and Mirowsky [ 30 ], and the other was the fear of crime question developed by Baker et al [ 42 ]. Each question assessed individual perception of noise, fear of crime and vandalism in the neighborhood: “How often do you experience noise from neighbors, traffic or other sources in your neighborhood (noise)?” “How often do you feel unsafe when you walk alone in your neighborhood (fear of crime)?” and “How often do you see vandalism in your neighborhood such as damaged property (vandalism)?” The possible scores for each question ranged from never [1], seldom [2], sometimes [3], regularly [4], and often [5].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It stands to reason that an actual victim of crime would not evaluate the police well (Dean 1980); however, a respondent who simply perceives insecurity might also evaluate the police poorly. Indeed, insecurity and fear of crime often have more to do with perceptions than objective crime rates (Baker et al 1983). It is also common to distinguish between egocentric evaluations, in this case based on one's perception of how she or he is personally affected by violence, and sociotropic evaluations, based on one's perception of how the community as a whole is affected.…”
Section: Explaining Variation In Citizen Evaluations Of the Policementioning
confidence: 99%