1996
DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1996.0052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of a Computer-Tailored Nutrition Intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
210
3
6

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 318 publications
(228 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
210
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess inclination toward the physical activity messages, participants rated the extent to which they found the physical activity message believable, informative, and interesting using a 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely) scale, α = .65 (Brug, Steenhuis, Van Assema, & De Vries, 1996). Motivation was measured using two-items in the form, "I will try (I intend) to participate in regular physical activity (i.e., moderate and vigorous activities performed at least three times per week for a total of at least 20 minutes per day) over the next two weeks," using a 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) scale, r(114) = .77, p < .01 (Armitage, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess inclination toward the physical activity messages, participants rated the extent to which they found the physical activity message believable, informative, and interesting using a 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely) scale, α = .65 (Brug, Steenhuis, Van Assema, & De Vries, 1996). Motivation was measured using two-items in the form, "I will try (I intend) to participate in regular physical activity (i.e., moderate and vigorous activities performed at least three times per week for a total of at least 20 minutes per day) over the next two weeks," using a 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) scale, r(114) = .77, p < .01 (Armitage, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), health status (cholesterol levels, blood pressure, etc. ), and psychosocial factors like attitudes, self-ef®cacy expectations, perceived threat and readiness for change have been used to individualise the feedback (Brug et al, 1996(Brug et al, , 1998Burling et al, 1989;Campbell et al, 1994;Van Beurden et al, 1990). The characteristics to which the information is tailored, the tailoring variables, should be relevant and important for the behaviour andaor the behaviour change that is targeted with the tailored intervention.…”
Section: Computer-tailoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ®rst study was conducted among employees of an oil company (Brug et al, 1996). The second study was conducted among employees of a regional health care organisation (Brug et al, in press), while the third experiment was done among a self-selected sample of healthy volunteers (Brug et al, 1998).…”
Section: S79mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food safety and sanitation educators are encouraged to explore the opportunities and challenges of these new technologies to enhance their work [7]. Brug, Steenhuis, Assema, and Vries's study [2] pointed out that computer-tailored food safety and sanitation information is a promising means of stimulating people to change their diet toward dietary recommendations.…”
Section: The Information Technology and Food Safety And Sanitation Edmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer tailored food safety and sanitation education has been studied for different dietary behaviours, in different target populations, and in different settings. In recent years, studies [2][3][4] that assessed the effects of interactive technology in food safety and sanitation education were based on the behaviour change theory. Computer tailored food safety and sanitation education is more likely to be read, remembered, and experienced as it is more personally relevant compared to standard materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%