2017
DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000001713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of a Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm on the Evaluation of Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules by Dual–Time Point 18F-FDG PET/CT

Abstract: We present the case of a patient with history of colon cancer, referred for the evaluation of indeterminate pulmonary nodules by F-FDG PET/CT. A dual-time point protocol was performed, and images were reconstructed using VUE Point HD and a Bayesian-penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm (Q.Clear). Visually, the quality of the images was considered better when Q.Clear was used with β value of 200, uptake in the smallest nodule (7 mm) was clearly visible only with Q.Clear reconstruction, and uptake in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In choosing among different reconstruction parameters in PET/CT scans, the clinician's visual impressions of the existence of lesions and SUVs often are the criteria on which such decisions are based. 39 , 40 For conventional PET/CT 18 F‐FDG lung nodule scans, an SUV > 2.5 has been considered a trigger point to modify patient management, 41 but if a lesion is sufficiently small its SUV will not reflect that value. 23 In our investigation the observed maximum SUV averaged 2.4 ± 0.3 for 25‐mm cylinders and was close to the intended cylinder‐to‐background radioactivity concentration ratio of 2.5, 19 but was only 1.4 ± 0.2 for 8‐mm cylinders, due to partial volume effects (Table 4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In choosing among different reconstruction parameters in PET/CT scans, the clinician's visual impressions of the existence of lesions and SUVs often are the criteria on which such decisions are based. 39 , 40 For conventional PET/CT 18 F‐FDG lung nodule scans, an SUV > 2.5 has been considered a trigger point to modify patient management, 41 but if a lesion is sufficiently small its SUV will not reflect that value. 23 In our investigation the observed maximum SUV averaged 2.4 ± 0.3 for 25‐mm cylinders and was close to the intended cylinder‐to‐background radioactivity concentration ratio of 2.5, 19 but was only 1.4 ± 0.2 for 8‐mm cylinders, due to partial volume effects (Table 4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 28 Unlike extensive literature reports on the benefits of TOF reconstructions, reports of regularized reconstruction’s benefits in quantitative measurements and qualitative visual image assessment using clinical data are scarce; however, our findings are consistent with a few case reports in the literature. 19 , 29 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] Clinically, BPL reconstruction reduces noise, especially in larger patients and within smaller lesions. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) body weight (BW, SUVmax) is a semi-quantitative metric for intensity of radiotracer activity within a region of interest accounting for amount of injected dose and BW while correcting for radioactive time decay [SUVmax 6 Medicine lesions) and this difference tends to be more pronounced in tumors relative to normal liver. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Alterations in relative SUVmax values, and the relationship between lesion SUV compared to liver, raise concern around accuracy and consistency from interpreting physicians, including when imaging lymphoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] Clinically, BPL reconstruction reduces noise, especially in larger patients and within smaller lesions. [9–15]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%