2013
DOI: 10.1117/12.2013748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of 14-nm photomask uncertainties on computational lithography solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Goal of 3-Segments chop is to best represent proximity error described in eq. [1]. Adjusting length and placement of segments, maximum local similarity with projected real mask is reached as in Fig.…”
Section: Figure3 Workflow Of Contour Extraction and Magnification Cal...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Goal of 3-Segments chop is to best represent proximity error described in eq. [1]. Adjusting length and placement of segments, maximum local similarity with projected real mask is reached as in Fig.…”
Section: Figure3 Workflow Of Contour Extraction and Magnification Cal...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This corner-chop then is uniquely determined by the corner step size using eq. [1]~eq. [3] with empirical coefficient 'A' fitted for a particular mask writing condition.…”
Section: Figure3 Workflow Of Contour Extraction and Magnification Cal...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, these mask variations may not be modeled with sufficient accuracy in OPC flows as a consequence of CPU time-saving tradeoffs. For example, mask corner rounding may be approximated by 'corner chipping' and nonlinearity may be lumped into the optical photoresist modeling kernel [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 One category of such uncertainties in the lithography system can be the photomask shape uncertainty. 5 The mask in lithography is made by e-beam writing, and can be imperfect with significant errors on the critical dimension (CD), which can influence the intra-field CD uniformity on the final wafer. 6 The CD non-uniformity, which is the error between printed mask CD and target CD during the mask making process, can be caused by the e-beam exposure, the e-beam resist process and the etch process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%