1973
DOI: 10.1017/s0031182000046552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The immunity arising from continuous low-level infection withEimeria tenella

Abstract: Daily infection with doses of approximately five oocysts ofEimeria tenellaproduced an infection with an extended patency which ceased by the time the birds had received about 140 oocysts. Total oocyst production was comparable with that in birds given the same number of oocysts in a single dose, but the immunity to subsequent heavy challenge was significantly greater. Continuous exposure to low-level infections may be more comparable to the field situation and the present results suggest how birds can acquire … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficacy of live parasite vaccination is influenced especially by the mode of administration. For example, continuous exposure with a low number of oocysts (5/day) induced significantly greater immunity compared with a single immunization with the same number of oocysts (Joyner & Norton, 1973). Oocyst production in repeatedly infected birds extended well beyond the period of patency of a single infection, but eventually ceased and the birds appeared to be highly immune compared to a single immunization regimen.…”
Section: Live Virulent Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficacy of live parasite vaccination is influenced especially by the mode of administration. For example, continuous exposure with a low number of oocysts (5/day) induced significantly greater immunity compared with a single immunization with the same number of oocysts (Joyner & Norton, 1973). Oocyst production in repeatedly infected birds extended well beyond the period of patency of a single infection, but eventually ceased and the birds appeared to be highly immune compared to a single immunization regimen.…”
Section: Live Virulent Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the use of litter in sheds, control by sanitation is impractical and immunological methods of control, while in use in many broiler breeder flocks, are not safe or economic for use in broiler chickens (Jeffers, 1987). Immunity in chickens to Eimeria tenella can be achieved by giving them daily doses of between one and 20 infective oocysts daily (Joyner & Norton, 1973). Recently, work on live attenuated vaccines has achieved some success (Shirley & Millard, 1986;Shirley & Bellatti, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joyner and Norton (1976) found that repeated dosing with E. maxima resulted in slightly longer patent periods than in birds given a single dose of oocysts. With E. tenella the patent period was doubled compared with birds given a single dose (Joyner and Norton, 1973). Two peaks in oocyst production were observed for E. brunetti and E. tenella in this study indicating that auto re-infection may have occurred during the experiment.…”
Section: E Tenellamentioning
confidence: 60%