2018
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky1006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB): 2018 update

Abstract: The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB, iedb.org) captures experimental data confined in figures, text and tables of the scientific literature, making it freely available and easily searchable to the public. The scope of the IEDB extends across immune epitope data related to all species studied and includes antibody, T cell, and MHC binding contexts associated with infectious, allergic, autoimmune, and transplant related diseases. Having been publicly accessible for >10 years, the recent focus of the IEDB has been … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
1,492
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,475 publications
(1,521 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
1,492
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…When examining the homologous regions of SARS-CoV, it has been found that the likely T cell epitopes are positive in assays such as ELISPOT, intra-cellular staining (ICS), and multimer/tetramer staining (see, e.g., Cheung et al, 2007Cheung et al, , 2008Kohyama et al, 2009;Tsao et al, 2006;Yang et al, 2009). We also sought to address potential SARS-CoV-2 epitopes by a completely different method, namely utilizing the epitope predictions hosted by the IEDB Vita et al, 2019). For B cell epitopes, we used methods that predict linear epitopes , and in the case of the spike glycoprotein where a reliable structure recently became available (Wrapp et al, 2020), the Discotope 2.0 method that also predicts epitopes based on protein conformation and residue exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When examining the homologous regions of SARS-CoV, it has been found that the likely T cell epitopes are positive in assays such as ELISPOT, intra-cellular staining (ICS), and multimer/tetramer staining (see, e.g., Cheung et al, 2007Cheung et al, , 2008Kohyama et al, 2009;Tsao et al, 2006;Yang et al, 2009). We also sought to address potential SARS-CoV-2 epitopes by a completely different method, namely utilizing the epitope predictions hosted by the IEDB Vita et al, 2019). For B cell epitopes, we used methods that predict linear epitopes , and in the case of the spike glycoprotein where a reliable structure recently became available (Wrapp et al, 2020), the Discotope 2.0 method that also predicts epitopes based on protein conformation and residue exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population coverages for sets of T cell epitopes were computed using the tool provided by the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) (http://tools.iedb.org/population/; accessed 21 February 2020) [30]. This tool uses the distribution of MHC alleles (with at least 4-digit resolution, e.g., A*02:01) within a defined population (obtained from http://www.allelefrequencies.net/) to estimate the population coverage for a set of T cell epitopes.…”
Section: Population-coverage-based T Cell Epitope Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To review how extensive our descriptive knowledge of CD8 + T cell responses is, we can turn to the great wealth of published epitope data reported in the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB; http://www.iedb.org), an online repository established in 2004 and kept up‐to‐date through manual curation . The IEDB primarily contains experimentally verified data on T and B cell assays as well as MHC binding and mass spectrometry identification of MHC‐ligands . The IEDB therefore presents an essential resource to assess metadata on T cell immunogenicity ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Cd8+ T Cell Responses Are Well Characterizedmentioning
confidence: 99%