2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2012.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The immediate effects of sigmoid colon manipulation on pressure pain thresholds in the lumbar spine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This study demonstrated that performing a commonly used Osteopathic technique, 'Diaphragm Release', can produce a statistically significant hypoalgesic effect specifically in the right (F(2,48) = 3.67, p= 0.034) and left (F(2,48) = 4.120, p= 0.048) cervical spine when compared to no treatment. Although MT techniques have demonstrated segmentally specific hypoalgesic effects (McSweeney et al 2012;Paungmali & O'Leary 2003;Vicenzino et al 2001;Wright 1995), this is the first sham-controlled study to demonstrate and quantify the magnitude of a hypoalgesic effect on mean pain pressure thresholds in the cervical spine immediately following an Osteopathic technique. Effect size should be reported in addition to probability values as in research 'statistical significance is not sufficiently useful to be invoked as the sole criterion for evaluating the noteworthiness…' (Thompson 2002 p. 66).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study demonstrated that performing a commonly used Osteopathic technique, 'Diaphragm Release', can produce a statistically significant hypoalgesic effect specifically in the right (F(2,48) = 3.67, p= 0.034) and left (F(2,48) = 4.120, p= 0.048) cervical spine when compared to no treatment. Although MT techniques have demonstrated segmentally specific hypoalgesic effects (McSweeney et al 2012;Paungmali & O'Leary 2003;Vicenzino et al 2001;Wright 1995), this is the first sham-controlled study to demonstrate and quantify the magnitude of a hypoalgesic effect on mean pain pressure thresholds in the cervical spine immediately following an Osteopathic technique. Effect size should be reported in addition to probability values as in research 'statistical significance is not sufficiently useful to be invoked as the sole criterion for evaluating the noteworthiness…' (Thompson 2002 p. 66).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…One study that utilises a similar mechanism was conducted by McSweeney et al (2012). This study found a statistically significant hypoalgesic effect specific to the L1 spinal segment after visceral mobilisation of the sigmoid colon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…An abdominal scar may draw the inferior mesenteric plexus, bringing about symptoms related to the sympathetic nervous system and to the correlated visceral and somatic spheres (T11–L2), as studies on cadavers have already proven 109. Therefore, visceral adhesions can affect the sympathetic nervous system, with varied symptomatology such as vertebral stiffness corresponding to the metameric innervation 110. The spinal trigeminal nucleus receives visceral information via the vagus nerve (and the glossopharyngeal nerve).…”
Section: Symptoms and Clinical Scenarios: Abdominal Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visceral mesoderm falls within the definition of fascia. There are several articles in literature that explain how the OMT fascial can improve the function of the organ, the symptoms, the quality of life in case of chronic visceral disorders, using manual indirect techniques on the organ (through pressure on the different tissue layers to influence the bowel): in some cases there is a reduction in drug dosage for pain and the reduction of pain in somatic areas (viscerosomatic reflexes) [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. Further research is needed to provide evidence of the effectiveness of the visceral approach [46].…”
Section: The Manual Osteopathic Approach To Visceramentioning
confidence: 99%