The immediacy of online news, the visibility of journalistic processes and a restructuring of journalistic authority

Karlsson, Michael

doi:10.1177/1464884910388223

Cited by 164 publications

(140 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

121

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the effects are not totally absent, although few and small, and when they occur the findings suggest that they indeed, as previous research suggests (Gillmor, 2004;Karlsson, 2011;Kovach & Rosenstiehl, 2001), have a positive effect on how the audience perceive journalism and news. Links in particular seem important as effects of those could be found in both source and message credibility.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 65%

“…This theoretical proposal also have an empirical dimension as research has shown that online journalism is being actually produced along transparency rather than objectivity criteria (see Karlsson, 2011, for an overview of the arguments). In a review by Karlsson (2010) on previous transparency research two different forms of transparency is suggested -disclosure and participatory transparency.…”

Section: Routines Norms and Credibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In recent years many practitioners and researchers have proposed that a new norm, transparency, is changing the way journalism builds credibility. Moreover, it is also suggested that transparency actually improves journalistic credibility and that users will put greater trust in news media as a results of this shift in journalistic practice (Allen, 2008;Gillmor, 2004;Karlsson, 2011;Kovach & Rosenstiehl, 2001;Lasorsa, 2012;Plaisance, 2007;Singer, 2007).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet

Karlsson¹,

Clerwall²,

Nord³

2014

Journalism Studies

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PreprintThis is the submitted version of a paper published in Journalism Studies. Citation for the original published paper (version of record):Karlsson, M., Clerwall, C., Nord, L. (2014) You ain´t seen nothing yet.: Transparency' s (lack of ) Effect on Source and Message Credibility. AbstractTransparency has been proposed to both change the way journalism is being produced and increase its credibility. However, little research has been conducted to assess the connection between transparency and credibility. This study utilizes an experimental setting (N=1320) to measure what impact transparency have on source and message credibility from the user perspective. The results reveals an almost absence of any transparency effect on both source and message credibility although some small significant effects could be observed primarily regarding internal hyperlinks, comments and contextual information. Although further research is desperately needed in this area the study suggest that transparency does not affect the credibility of journalism in the eyes of the contemporary audience and thus have limited appeal as a new norm in journalism.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 65%

Section: Routines Norms and Credibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet

Karlsson¹,

Clerwall²,

Nord³

2014

Journalism Studies

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Normative theories, which undergirded the earliest efforts to conceptualize journalism by scholars (Wahl-Jorgensen and Hanitzsch 2013) as well as practitioners, also face new challenges. Is transparency the new objectivity, as some have suggested (Karlsson 2011;Hellmueller et al 2013)? Is interaction replacing independence, or can they somehow co-exist?…”

Section: Journalism Studiesmentioning

confidence: 97%

Trajectories

Singer¹

2014

Journalism Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Erixon, 2010;Metzger & Flanagin, 2008), journalism (cf. Hayes, Singer, & Ceppos, 2007;Karlsson, 2011), politics (cf. Loader & Mercea, 2012;Nilsson & Carlsson, 2013) and so on how traditional structures of authority are being negotiated.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Why Does the Archbishop Not Tweet?

Gelfgren

2015

Nordicom Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In summer 2012, the Archbishop of the Church of Sweden appeared on Twitter. There was only one problem -it was not the Archbishop himself who was tweeting, but an anonymous person. A discussion then ensued on Twitter and in the blogosphere between those in favor of the Archbishop and his department and mainly social media proponents.The present article describes and analyzes the social media debate, and how authority and hierarchies are negotiated in and through social media. The analysis is based on Heidi Campbell's "Religious-Social Shaping of Technology" model, and emphasizes the need to take into account not only the faith and tradition of the religious actor, but also the societal context in which the negotiating process takes place. In this case, the concepts of "mediatization" and "secularization" are used to understand the broader context of the process.

show abstract

The immediacy of online news, the visibility of journalistic processes and a restructuring of journalistic authority

Cited by 164 publications

References 40 publications

You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet

You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet

Trajectories

Why Does the Archbishop Not Tweet?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About