The IMAGEN study: a decade of imaging genetics in adolescents

Abstract

Imaging genetics offers the possibility of detecting associations between genotype and brain structure as well as function, with effect sizes potentially exceeding correlations between genotype and behavior. However, study results are often limited due to small sample sizes and methodological differences, thus reducing the reliability of findings. The IMAGEN cohort with 2000 young adolescents assessed from the age of 14 onwards tries to eliminate some of these limitations by offering a longitudinal approach and sufficient sample size for analyzing gene-environment interactions on brain structure and function. Here, we give a systematic review of IMAGEN publications since the start of the consortium. We then focus on the specific phenotype ‘drug use’ to illustrate the potential of the IMAGEN approach. We describe findings with respect to frontocortical, limbic and striatal brain volume, functional activation elicited by reward anticipation, behavioral inhibition, and affective faces, and their respective associations with drug intake. In addition to describing its strengths, we also discuss limitations of the IMAGEN study. Because of the longitudinal design and related attrition, analyses are underpowered for (epi-) genome-wide approaches due to the limited sample size. Estimating the generalizability of results requires replications in independent samples. However, such densely phenotyped longitudinal studies are still rare and alternative internal cross-validation methods (e.g., leave-one out, split-half) are also warranted. In conclusion, the IMAGEN cohort is a unique, very well characterized longitudinal sample, which helped to elucidate neurobiological mechanisms involved in complex behavior and offers the possibility to further disentangle genotype × phenotype interactions.

<p>The Impact of Childhood Trauma on Developing Bipolar Disorder: Current Understanding and Ensuring Continued Progress</p>

“…This process involves disruption of the psychological and biological systems mediating responses to stressful events and may remain difficult to describe in precise mechanistic terms until the culmination of large-scale longitudinal studies, such as the UK Biobank, the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study and the IMAGEN project. 173–176 These are well placed to address the interactions of CT with biological markers (eg, genetic, brain-derived, hormonal or inflammatory-based) to determine the contributions to the development of BD, its course and severity. Understanding the nature of and key players in this protracted course of causal events and the ensuing altered trajectories of individuals’ mental wellbeing and resilience will be vital to the potential progress of effective monitoring, management and intervention standards.…”

Study protocol of comprehensive risk evaluation for anorexia nervosa in twins (CREAT): a study of discordant monozygotic twins with anorexia nervosa

“…This decision is practical as we were unable to identify discordant MZ male twins in the register and it is essential that we only study twins who have passed through the age of risk to ensure unaffected status. Lastly, similar to other complex studies [76], planned analyses represent a mixture of hypothesis-driven and exploratory research questions. The exploratory aims emerge from findings in the literature regarding where differences may lie in affected versus unaffected individuals.…”

Neuroimaging in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

“…The IMAGEN consortium comprises a longitudinal, sex-balanced cohort of ∼2000 nonclinically ascertained adolescents from eight European centers [ 21 ]. These data allowed Barker et al [ 22 ] to report an association between ADHD PRS (from the first ADHD genome-wide significant findings) [ 17 ] with impulsivity and body mass index phenotypes, mediated by grey matter volumes (in bilateral cerebellum, amygdala, hippocampus, parahippocampus, and orbital frontal cortex), and by function on a monetary incentive delay fMRI task (in fusiform gyrus and parahippocampus, postcentral and parietal inferior, calcarine and occipital superior, and frontal superior medial cortices).…”